We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Driveway Access - Pinch Points - Knowing My Rights for Right of Way
Options
Comments
-
MattFurious said:Ath_Wat said:At the moment you can always drive through to park your car in the garage. Whether the neighbour parks his car on it or doesn't is fairly irrelevant to you as long as he doesn't block your ability to do that.
What are you hoping to gain from spending money on a solicitor? To try and force him into letting you wash your car on the drive, or just to stop him parking there out of revenge for him not letting you do things?
Remember it is his land. I wouldn't want someone on my land spraying water around for an hour every Sunday when my kids might want to ride their bikes up and down it. Maybe he wanted to do folk dancing where you were washing your car, or where your kids were riding their bikes up and down. It's his land, he can do whatever he likes on it as long as he can move to let you through when you need to go through. You can't.
All I want to know is, based on the deeds, what are my rights. Why so much negativity. Chill, relax and be merry.
Mr Fury was the name I wanted to use, but thought it to be comical by making it furious instead. It was all tongue in cheek fun, but I guess some of you see the name and think of me as some furious cyclone of a monster LMAO!!
Anyway, happy times. Stay safe and keep the positive constructive messages coming in
You could buy your kids new bikes instead.0 -
Ath_Wat said:MattFurious said:Ath_Wat said:At the moment you can always drive through to park your car in the garage. Whether the neighbour parks his car on it or doesn't is fairly irrelevant to you as long as he doesn't block your ability to do that.
What are you hoping to gain from spending money on a solicitor? To try and force him into letting you wash your car on the drive, or just to stop him parking there out of revenge for him not letting you do things?
Remember it is his land. I wouldn't want someone on my land spraying water around for an hour every Sunday when my kids might want to ride their bikes up and down it. Maybe he wanted to do folk dancing where you were washing your car, or where your kids were riding their bikes up and down. It's his land, he can do whatever he likes on it as long as he can move to let you through when you need to go through. You can't.
All I want to know is, based on the deeds, what are my rights. Why so much negativity. Chill, relax and be merry.
Mr Fury was the name I wanted to use, but thought it to be comical by making it furious instead. It was all tongue in cheek fun, but I guess some of you see the name and think of me as some furious cyclone of a monster LMAO!!
Anyway, happy times. Stay safe and keep the positive constructive messages coming in
You could buy your kids new bikes instead.1 -
How long until you get letters about you allowing your visitors to park on their drive, Your solicitors have shafted you here, and so have the developers by not making it joint ownership.On the other matter Letter head of 'David and David' rather than 'David and David law' would keep it in the law but looking more 'official' The Dangers of internet forums lol, I've seen it suggested many times.
0 -
markin said:How long until you get letters about you allowing your visitors to park on their drive, Your solicitors have shafted you here, and so have the developers by not making it joint ownership.
0 -
-
Norman_Castle said:boundary-problems.co.uk /boundary-problems/ priv-r-o-w.html0
-
Norman_Castle said:Ah, I'd forgotten all about that site! Had it saved on the old computer. Thanks.It reinforces one of the points I made earlier about servient owners wanting to limit use:Excessive user Owners of servient tenements are sometimes aggrieved when there is a dramatic increase in the traffic using the right of way across their land. They may take Court action pleading excessive user, ie. that a higher level of use than permitted has taken place. Such action is almost certainly doomed to failure because, whilst other limits may be in place on the right of way, there is usually no limit on the number of times in a given period that the dominant tenement may use the right of way.
2 -
A quote i read in the link above match that of my initial discussion topic, pinch points...
"If the width, height and weight limits of the right of way are not explicitly stated in the deed of grant then the courts will decide that these limits were set by naturally occurring restrictions that were in place at the time of the grant, such as the width of a gate at the entrance to the carriageway."
The pinch point of the RoW is 3.8m which is naturally occurring, so that should be the determining factor for the width. It depends whether it would be considered a carriageway or if a maximum expected RoW would have a maximum of 10ft (approx 3m) instead.
Just to confirm, I am the dominant tenement, as I have the RoW and my neighbour is the servient tenement as they are burdened with the RoW???
So in effect, I think this is the key concept, if there should be a minimum of 10ft available to pass up and down the drive, then the servient may not park cars on that 10ft strip to allow the dominant access to the RoW.
This in effect is "This is my right" - We are getting someonewhere!!!1 -
I think you'll find that you won't get anywhere as long as you can get up and down it past a parked car - those lines apply, I would have thought, to permanent restrictions.
They can of course put whatever they like on their land any time they like, as long as they move it when you need to get by. if they habitually parked a car in a way that you had to ask them to move it, you might have a case. I am fairly sure you won't have one if it has never impeded you.
0 -
Ath_Wat said:I think you'll find that you won't get anywhere as long as you can get up and down it past a parked car - those lines apply, I would have thought, to permanent restrictions.
They can of course put whatever they like on their land any time they like, as long as they move it when you need to get by. if they habitually parked a car in a way that you had to ask them to move it, you might have a case. I am fairly sure you won't have one if it has never impeded you.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards