We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Urgent advice needed on faulty goods
Comments
-
Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
If it's a rule which applies to limited companies then (as with almost everything else) it's going to be the same principle no matter the size of company.Manxman_in_exile said:Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
Of course you can. You are the sole, and legal representative of your Ltd co and therefore have a duty to represent it in court should you choose.Manxman_in_exile said:Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
Here we go - Civil Practice Rule 39.6:
"39.6 A company or other corporation may be represented at trial by an employee if –(a) the employee has been authorised by the company or corporation to appear at trial on its behalf; and
(b) the court gives permission."
So at the discretion of the judge.
0 -
It comes down to the judges discretion and there are circumstances where judges are guided not to allow lay representation. In other but similar legal jurisdictions, eg Ireland, the guidance is much stronger that it should be in exceptional circumstances only. You'll see McDonald v McCaughey 2014 often quoted.Manxman_in_exile said:Sandtree said:
Because a company cannot turn up in court themselves and so must be represented by a suitable qualified legal professional and legal costs are barred from the small claims court. Cost of such professional will be much more than a £150 toasterEqualiser12345 said:
If I provide services as a sole trader through my own limited company , are you saying that if my company gets sued in small claims that I can't deal with it in court myself?
(I don't know the answer but I'm curious to know it)
In theory any one (a natural or incorporated) can be represented by a lay person if they themselves are in the court room* too... if they are not personally in the court room* they should be represented by a qualified lawyer. The "problem" is that a company is not a natural person and so cannot go to the court in person... a director or shareholder may say they are a representative of the company but they are not the company itself. Obviously nothing stops them being witnesses or present.
* - obv inc virtual court rooms these days0 -
In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.0
-
What's your basis for that? I've just cited the relevant rules (for England & Wales anyway).Equaliser12345 said:In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.0 -
The rule you posted is not mandating that external legal representation is necessary. Freedom to choose legal representation (or not) is entirely up to the party.user1977 said:
What's your basis for that? I've just cited the relevant rules (for England & Wales anyway).Equaliser12345 said:In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.
As an employee, you are representing the company. However, to represent a party in a professional capacity, you need to be a qualified representative. The Rule is simply saying that if you are an employee then you may represent the company.
I've been an in-house solicitor for years and have never seen a Court object to an employee representing a company.1 -
Oh and the McDonald case is misleading. That dealt with who has the right to represent in Court. Not who must.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
