We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Urgent advice needed on faulty goods

13»

Comments

  • Sorry - badly expressed.

    What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).

    I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,186 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Sorry - badly expressed.

    What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).

    I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.
    If it's a rule which applies to limited companies then (as with almost everything else) it's going to be the same principle no matter the size of company.
  • shiraz99
    shiraz99 Posts: 1,841 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Sorry - badly expressed.

    What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).

    I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.
    Of course you can. You are the sole, and legal representative of your Ltd co and therefore have a duty to represent it in court should you choose.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,186 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 17 May 2022 at 12:23PM
    Here we go - Civil Practice Rule 39.6:

    "39.6 A company or other corporation may be represented at trial by an employee if –

    (a) the employee has been authorised by the company or corporation to appear at trial on its behalf; and

    (b) the court gives permission."

    So at the discretion of the judge.



  • Sandtree
    Sandtree Posts: 10,628 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Sandtree said:
    Sandtree said:
    Olinda99 said:
    your remedy is simple - small claims court. simple to do, and on the face of it you would win - a toaster should last longer
    Are you factoring in the fact the the buyer may have been a limited company?
    Why does it matter?  
    Because a company cannot turn up in court themselves and so must be represented by a suitable qualified legal professional and legal costs are barred from the small claims court. Cost of such professional will be much more than a £150 toaster

    If I provide services as a sole trader through my own limited company , are you saying that if my company gets sued in small claims that I can't deal with it in court myself?

    (I don't know the answer but I'm curious to know it)
    It comes down to the judges discretion and there are circumstances where judges are guided not to allow lay representation. In other but similar legal jurisdictions, eg Ireland, the guidance is much stronger that it should be in exceptional circumstances only. You'll see McDonald v McCaughey 2014 often quoted.

    In theory any one (a natural or incorporated) can be represented by a lay person if they themselves are in the court room* too... if they are not personally in the court room* they should be represented by a qualified lawyer. The "problem" is that a company is not a natural person and so cannot go to the court in person... a director or shareholder may say they are a representative of the company but they are not the company itself. Obviously nothing stops them being witnesses or present.

    * - obv inc virtual court rooms these days
  • In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,186 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.
    What's your basis for that? I've just cited the relevant rules (for England & Wales anyway).
  • user1977 said:
    In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.
    What's your basis for that? I've just cited the relevant rules (for England & Wales anyway).
    The rule you posted is not mandating that external legal representation is necessary.  Freedom to choose legal representation (or not) is entirely up to the party.

    As an employee, you are representing the company.  However, to represent a party in a professional capacity, you need to be a qualified representative.  The Rule is simply saying that if you are an employee then you may represent the company.  

    I've been an in-house solicitor for years and have never seen a Court object to an employee representing a company.  
  • Oh and the McDonald case is misleading.  That dealt with who has the right to represent in Court.  Not who must. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.