We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Urgent advice needed on faulty goods
Comments
-
Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
Manxman_in_exile said:Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
Manxman_in_exile said:Sorry - badly expressed.
What I mean is if I'm the only person providing the service and I'm doing it through my own limited company, can I not represent the company myself if it gets sued in the small claims court (or whatever it's called).
I don't know the answer but I'd like to know it.0 -
Here we go - Civil Practice Rule 39.6:
"39.6 A company or other corporation may be represented at trial by an employee if –(a) the employee has been authorised by the company or corporation to appear at trial on its behalf; and
(b) the court gives permission."
So at the discretion of the judge.
0 -
Manxman_in_exile said:Sandtree said:Equaliser12345 said:
If I provide services as a sole trader through my own limited company , are you saying that if my company gets sued in small claims that I can't deal with it in court myself?
(I don't know the answer but I'm curious to know it)
In theory any one (a natural or incorporated) can be represented by a lay person if they themselves are in the court room* too... if they are not personally in the court room* they should be represented by a qualified lawyer. The "problem" is that a company is not a natural person and so cannot go to the court in person... a director or shareholder may say they are a representative of the company but they are not the company itself. Obviously nothing stops them being witnesses or present.
* - obv inc virtual court rooms these days0 -
In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.0
-
Equaliser12345 said:In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.0
-
user1977 said:Equaliser12345 said:In the UK, you do NOT need legal representation.
As an employee, you are representing the company. However, to represent a party in a professional capacity, you need to be a qualified representative. The Rule is simply saying that if you are an employee then you may represent the company.
I've been an in-house solicitor for years and have never seen a Court object to an employee representing a company.1 -
Oh and the McDonald case is misleading. That dealt with who has the right to represent in Court. Not who must.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards