We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deed of variation for rent charge.

Hello.

Long story short I am looking to buy a property on a new estate which is subject to an estate rent charge. Things are not really going well as I am now 5 month in from the offer being accepted and still no further forward. Turns out my lender may require a deed of variation, as section 121 of the law of property act has not been removed from the TP1. For those unaware this means that a lease can be put on the property and repossession taken if fees to the management company are unpaid for 40 days, a common problem now with many freehold new builds across the country I've learnt, hence the term "fleecehold".

In addition to this after 3 month of non payment the rent charge owner can enter the property and "hold the property", until all fees are recovered. This part I don't really understand fully. Does this mean that even if I had the section 121 powers removed (as most lenders require), that repossession could still be taken unless I have this 3 month clause removed from the TP1 as well?

Ultimately I have decided that regardless of what the lender requires (since their requirements will most likely only protect themselves), I am going to request a deed of variation myself. I will require that the rent charge owner has no power whatsoever to put a lease on the property or to reposses the property. I think my chances are slim, but that being said I know that it is now becoming much more common for these powers to be removed from deeds, so maybe I stand a chance. Either way if it doesn't happen then I'll be walking away.

My question is what exactly should the deed of variation include and how should it be written? I was hoping that someone may have a deed of variation example, since apparently this is now very common issue. Also is this something that is usually accepted by the rent charge owner?  Any other advice would be appreciated.. timings and costs for deed of variation etc.

Thanks for any help.


Comments

  • Troy_af said:

    Hello.

    Long story short I am looking to buy a property on a new estate which is subject to an estate rent charge. Things are not really going well as I am now 5 month in from the offer being accepted and still no further forward. Turns out my lender may require a deed of variation, as section 121 of the law of property act has not been removed from the TP1. For those unaware this means that a lease can be put on the property and repossession taken if fees to the management company are unpaid for 40 days, a common problem now with many freehold new builds across the country I've learnt, hence the term "fleecehold".

    In addition to this after 3 month of non payment the rent charge owner can enter the property and "hold the property", until all fees are recovered. This part I don't really understand fully. Does this mean that even if I had the section 121 powers removed (as most lenders require), that repossession could still be taken unless I have this 3 month clause removed from the TP1 as well?

    Ultimately I have decided that regardless of what the lender requires (since their requirements will most likely only protect themselves), I am going to request a deed of variation myself. I will require that the rent charge owner has no power whatsoever to put a lease on the property or to reposses the property. I think my chances are slim, but that being said I know that it is now becoming much more common for these powers to be removed from deeds, so maybe I stand a chance. Either way if it doesn't happen then I'll be walking away.

    My question is what exactly should the deed of variation include and how should it be written? I was hoping that someone may have a deed of variation example, since apparently this is now very common issue. Also is this something that is usually accepted by the rent charge owner?  Any other advice would be appreciated.. timings and costs for deed of variation etc.

    Thanks for any help.


    Did you ever get this sorted?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.