We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New Build - Is This A Hazard?

Hi everyone,

Long time lurker here!

My fiancé and I have just moved into our first (New Build) home. Obviously snags etc happen - that's all fine - as does the actual structure of the house as compared to the architects drawing. The contentious hazard has came outside our front door - there's a bit of a gap between the front of our house, and the pedestrian paving. We had been expecting a step of some variation throughout the process (they only tarmac-ed this right at the very end) - and now we've ended up with this really odd drop as the developer 'needs to separate the private property from the pedestrian paving). Everyone who has came to visit (including our new neighbours!) have stated it looks like a hazard - so I'd appreciate any thoughts from you lot! 
«1

Comments

  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Well, it looks silly, I'd agree. 
     
    In order to meet the building regulations, the threshold needs to be accessible for those in wheelchairs, but that hasn't been designed properly, it looks a bit bodged by a ground-worker.   I don't think that a step that isn't level is particularly safe.  

    You can delineate between private and public property with a kerbstone that runs level in the tarmac, or extend the ramp away from the step part.  



    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • DJMB92
    DJMB92 Posts: 6 Forumite
    First Post
    (Just to confirm, there are two 'ramps' on either side - but it doesn't negate the fact that it's inherently unsafe!)
  • Noneforit999
    Noneforit999 Posts: 634 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    That looks horrific. 
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 10,225 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 6 May 2022 at 8:10AM
    DJMB92 said:

    My fiancé and I have just moved into our first (New Build) home. Obviously snags etc happen - that's all fine - as does the actual structure of the house as compared to the architects drawing. The contentious hazard has came outside our front door - there's a bit of a gap between the front of our house, and the pedestrian paving. We had been expecting a step of some variation throughout the process (they only tarmac-ed this right at the very end) - and now we've ended up with this really odd drop as the developer 'needs to separate the private property from the pedestrian paving). Everyone who has came to visit (including our new neighbours!) have stated it looks like a hazard - so I'd appreciate any thoughts from you lot! 
    Yes, it is a hazard.

    If it is intended to be a step then it needs to be designed as a step.  If it isn't then it needs to be designed in a way which clearly signals it is a drop, not a step.  Some people would put in a short length of handrail, others might build a dwarf wall in a contrasting material.

    Whatever is done it needs to convey that the drop is higher than people would normally expect from a step, or else physically stop people going in that direction.

    If the developer insists it is Ok then point out to them that they have had to put in ramps for wheelchair access, so what is there to stop a wheelchair going over the edge of the 'ramp' and tipping the occupant out, in a way that may prove to have a fatal outcome.  They also need to think about the safety of blind and partially-sighted people.  That doesn't mean there's a need for tactile paving etc, but they should have designed out the risk.
  • Woolsery
    Woolsery Posts: 1,535 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I can see the local skateboarders loving it!
  • RelievedSheff
    RelievedSheff Posts: 12,691 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    That isn't designed to be a step. It is a flag on edge retaining wall. 

    The access to the front door is via the two ramps and access paths to either side.

    Poor design that is for sure but it won't contravene any regulations. Retaining walls don't need a guard rail unless they are 600mm or over.
  • canaldumidi
    canaldumidi Posts: 3,511 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Section62 said:
    DJMB92 said:

    My fiancé and I have just moved into our first (New Build) home. Obviously snags etc happen - that's all fine - as does the actual structure of the house as compared to the architects drawing. The contentious hazard has came outside our front door - there's a bit of a gap between the front of our house, and the pedestrian paving. We had been expecting a step of some variation throughout the process (they only tarmac-ed this right at the very end) - and now we've ended up with this really odd drop as the developer 'needs to separate the private property from the pedestrian paving). Everyone who has came to visit (including our new neighbours!) have stated it looks like a hazard - so I'd appreciate any thoughts from you lot! 
    Yes, it is a hazard.

    ..

    If the developer insists it is Ok then point out to them that they have had to put in ramps for wheelchair access, so what is there to stop a wheelchair going over the edge of the 'ramp' and tipping the occupant out, in a way that may prove to have a fatal outcome. ..
    And remind them that now that you have pointed out the risks, should you, any of your visitors, or 3rd oarties (postie, delivery men etc) fall off and injure(kill?) themselves they will be facing a claim .....
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,354 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Section62 said:
    DJMB92 said:

    My fiancé and I have just moved into our first (New Build) home. Obviously snags etc happen - that's all fine - as does the actual structure of the house as compared to the architects drawing. The contentious hazard has came outside our front door - there's a bit of a gap between the front of our house, and the pedestrian paving. We had been expecting a step of some variation throughout the process (they only tarmac-ed this right at the very end) - and now we've ended up with this really odd drop as the developer 'needs to separate the private property from the pedestrian paving). Everyone who has came to visit (including our new neighbours!) have stated it looks like a hazard - so I'd appreciate any thoughts from you lot! 
    Yes, it is a hazard.

    ..

    If the developer insists it is Ok then point out to them that they have had to put in ramps for wheelchair access, so what is there to stop a wheelchair going over the edge of the 'ramp' and tipping the occupant out, in a way that may prove to have a fatal outcome. ..
    And remind them that now that you have pointed out the risks, should you, any of your visitors, or 3rd oarties (postie, delivery men etc) fall off and injure(kill?) themselves they will be facing a claim .....
    But it sounds like it's on the OP's land, so it's the OP who would face any claim...
  • DJMB92
    DJMB92 Posts: 6 Forumite
    First Post
    Thanks everyone so far for your thoughts! We were out all day yesterday, so I'll be measuring it today so I can get back to the developer. Understood that it isn't intended to be a step - but it serves no purpose, and is dangerous (in my opinion) - and exactly user1977, it's on our land, so we'd face the claim. In addition, there isn't the space to actually wheel a wheelchair around the corner of the ramp into the front door, so that throws that argument out the window...
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.