We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
TA6 form question 14.1: Any point to this?
nohomeyet
Posts: 6 Forumite
14.1 on the form is "Is this sale dependent on the seller completing the purchase of another property on the same day?" [i.e. is there a chain].
Has anyone had experience of any successful recourse against the vendor if they fill this in to say no, when actually the answer is yes? I've spent ages reading online and property misrepresentation claims appear to only apply (or are worth taking forward) if something significant such as "Has the property flooded before" is lied about etc.
Our decision to go with X property was due to "no chain" when this clearly wasn't the case. All vendors these days say "Oh we're going into rented and moving ASAP" then nothing happens for a year!
Has anyone had experience of any successful recourse against the vendor if they fill this in to say no, when actually the answer is yes? I've spent ages reading online and property misrepresentation claims appear to only apply (or are worth taking forward) if something significant such as "Has the property flooded before" is lied about etc.
Our decision to go with X property was due to "no chain" when this clearly wasn't the case. All vendors these days say "Oh we're going into rented and moving ASAP" then nothing happens for a year!
0
Comments
-
Did you hear that the situation had changed before contracts were exchanged, or afterwards?0
-
Hello, thanks for your reply. We have not exchanged yet, although we have tried to suggest doing so with a back dated date to no avail.0
-
I can't how you could have a claim if you don't exchange contracts. I doubt it's intended to be enforceable in that way, just for everybody's info during negotiations.4
-
Yes it appears that in this country, everything is completely meaningless until you exchange. Having an offer accepted means f all!0
-
I don't think you have anything to go on then. Things can obviously change between sending you the form and exchange. As long as they inform you of them by the point of exchange, they've done what they need to.nohomeyet said:Hello, thanks for your reply. We have not exchanged yet, although we have tried to suggest doing so with a back dated date to no avail.
Why would you want to exchange with a backdated date??0 -
The idea was to define a fixed completion date in X months but that failed as they clearly had no intention of moving out and renting.0
-
Circumstances change, for all you know there may not be anywhere suitable for them to rent. Not everything has to be based on lies and deceit. Your options are to pull out or wait until the chain is complete. You have absolutely nothing to stand on with regards forcing anyone to do anything in the same way if you lost your job prior to exchange and couldn't afford the mortgage anymore the vendor could not force you to exchange.0
-
Ah, captain obvious strikes again!1
-
Or any myriad of lame excusesMysteryMe said:Circumstances change, for all you know there may not be anywhere suitable for them to rent. Not everything has to be based on lies and deceit. Your options are to pull out or wait until the chain is complete. You have absolutely nothing to stand on with regards forcing anyone to do anything in the same way if you lost your job prior to exchange and couldn't afford the mortgage anymore the vendor could not force you to exchange.
The system needs overhauling but ....... people tend to present another myriad of lame excuses.Your life is too short to be unhappy 5 days a week in exchange for 2 days of freedom!0 -
What is lame about not being able to find a rental property exactly?3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
