We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
selling house to son process
Comments
-
cluelessoldf said:
He has had 3 valuations done, all saying the same.. around 130-140. zopa, strike and some local estate agent.theartfullodger said:Assuming you haven't lived in it all the time there will be CGT to pay, ultimately HMRC can decide to tax you on what they think is market value, not what paperwork says. Declared and paid within , 60 days of sale (!)
You should at the least get day 3 valuations of the place. I'd never sell on the basis of the purchaser's valuation, for obvious reasons, and doubt HMRC would accept that figure.
When I did maths £130 divided by 3 wasn't £43.
What evidence do you have for son and ex having a beneficial interest in the place? Paperwork?
Has any rent been being paid for his or anyone else's occupation?
Artful, 74 yr old oldf'Zopa'? If you mean 'Zoopla' then ignore this completely.Likewise 'strike'.How many local estate agents? I suggest 3+.
no rent being paid since I moved out, he does pay all the bills though.
No CGT to pay as I have been living with a new partner, we don't own that house and its not my secondary legal residence. I own one house and always haveYou moved out so it was no longer your primary residence. Therefore there is a potential Capital Gains Tax liability when you sell. This will be based on* the price you paid at purchase* the market price when you transfer to your son* how many years you lived there* how many years you did not live there* plus allowances eg capital improvements, seling costs, your annual CGT allowance
0 -
That's the issue HE's had 3 valuations done: To protect your interests, especially relating to HMRC believing you, YOU should get 3 valuations done.cluelessoldf said:
He has had 3 valuations done, all saying the same.. around 130-140. zopa, strike and some local estate agent.theartfullodger said:................
You should at the least get day 3 valuations of the place. I'd never sell on the basis of the purchaser's valuation, for obvious reasons, and doubt HMRC would accept that figure.
................
..............
If you owned it & were living elsewhere of course there's CGT to be paid..0 -
Hi Matecanaldumidi said:cluelessoldf said:
He has had 3 valuations done, all saying the same.. around 130-140. zopa, strike and some local estate agent.theartfullodger said:Assuming you haven't lived in it all the time there will be CGT to pay, ultimately HMRC can decide to tax you on what they think is market value, not what paperwork says. Declared and paid within , 60 days of sale (!)
You should at the least get day 3 valuations of the place. I'd never sell on the basis of the purchaser's valuation, for obvious reasons, and doubt HMRC would accept that figure.
When I did maths £130 divided by 3 wasn't £43.
What evidence do you have for son and ex having a beneficial interest in the place? Paperwork?
Has any rent been being paid for his or anyone else's occupation?
Artful, 74 yr old oldf'Zopa'? If you mean 'Zoopla' then ignore this completely.Likewise 'strike'.How many local estate agents? I suggest 3+.
no rent being paid since I moved out, he does pay all the bills though.
No CGT to pay as I have been living with a new partner, we don't own that house and its not my secondary legal residence. I own one house and always haveYou moved out so it was no longer your primary residence. Therefore there is a potential Capital Gains Tax liability when you sell. This will be based on* the price you paid at purchase* the market price when you transfer to your son* how many years you lived there* how many years you did not live there* plus allowances eg capital improvements, seling costs, your annual CGT allowance
thanks for words. I have never officially moved out, how will the HMRC prove that I haven't been living there the whole time? I have lived in the house since the 60s since it was my mother and fathers, and not been living there since 20190 -
Rent doesn;t have to me money. It may also be "money's worth", so if e.g. he was paying insurance, repairs, re-decoration costs then very likely that would be ruled rent and you should have declared it to HMRC...cluelessoldf said:..
.....
no rent being paid since I moved out, he does pay all the bills though.0 -
council tax, electric, gastheartfullodger said:
Rent doesn;t have to me money. It may also be "money's worth", so if e.g. he was paying insurance, repairs, re-decoration costs then very likely that would be ruled rent and you should have declared it to HMRC...cluelessoldf said:..
.....
no rent being paid since I moved out, he does pay all the bills though.0 -
So you are telling us you are planning on defrauding the tax man?? If that is the case I hope, if only for the sake of all decent tax-payers, that HMRC find out & apply such fees and penalties as they may. You might be surprised to find out how much they know about us all these days.cluelessoldf said:
Hi Mate.....
thanks for words. I have never officially moved out, how will the HMRC prove that I haven't been living there the whole time? I have lived in the house since the 60s since it was my mother and fathers, and not been living there since 20192 -
no defrauding going on here. I don't own two housestheartfullodger said:
So you are telling us you are planning on defrauding the tax man?? If that is the case I hope, if only for the sake of all decent tax-payers, that HMRC find out & apply such fees and penalties as they may. You might be surprised to find out how much they know about us all these days.cluelessoldf said:
Hi Mate.....
thanks for words. I have never officially moved out, how will the HMRC prove that I haven't been living there the whole time? I have lived in the house since the 60s since it was my mother and fathers, and not been living there since 2019
from HMRC
" Only or main residenceIf you live in, as your home, 2 or more houses, you can only have one main residence at a time for Private Residence Relief.
You can nominate which residence is to be treated as your main residence for any period "
Then I nominate the house I actually own
0 -
But it isn't your residence. You've just told us you haven't resided there since 2019.cluelessoldf said:
no defrauding going on here. I don't own two housestheartfullodger said:
So you are telling us you are planning on defrauding the tax man?? If that is the case I hope, if only for the sake of all decent tax-payers, that HMRC find out & apply such fees and penalties as they may. You might be surprised to find out how much they know about us all these days.cluelessoldf said:
Hi Mate.....
thanks for words. I have never officially moved out, how will the HMRC prove that I haven't been living there the whole time? I have lived in the house since the 60s since it was my mother and fathers, and not been living there since 2019
from HMRC
" Only or main residenceIf you live in, as your home, 2 or more houses, you can only have one main residence at a time for Private Residence Relief.
You can nominate which residence is to be treated as your main residence for any period "
Then I nominate the house I actually own
3 -
no defrauding going on here. I don't own two houses
from HMRC
" Only or main residenceIf you live in, as your home, 2 or more houses, you can only have one main residence at a time for Private Residence Relief.
You can nominate which residence is to be treated as your main residence for any period "
Then I nominate the house I actually own
That's not how it works. Your quote clearly says "If you live in, as your home, 2 or more houses,...."a) You don't own 2 houses so cannot nominate between them andb) you don't 'live in' them bothHi Mate
thanks for words. I have never officially moved out, how will the HMRC prove that I haven't been living there the whole time? I have lived in the house since the 60s since it was my mother and fathers, and not been living there since 2019
I (and others) are explaining the law. Whether you choose to follow the law or break it is up to you. Whether HMRC can, and do, catch you out, is not something I or others can foresee.But clearly from what you've written, you do intend or hope to defraud HMRC since you do not qualify for primary residence relief. Mate.
Having said that, do the maths- you may not actually have a CGT liability due to allowances etc.
ps:no idea what you mean by " I have never officially moved out". Either a property is your primary residence or it is not. Since you earlier said you'd moved out, then it is not.
4 -
But you don't live in them both as your home - you moved out...cluelessoldf said:no defrauding going on here. I don't own two houses
from HMRC
" Only or main residenceIf you live in, as your home, 2 or more houses, you can only have one main residence at a time for Private Residence Relief.
You can nominate which residence is to be treated as your main residence for any period "
Then I nominate the house I actually own
3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
