Dummies guide to COP?

1.7K Posts


I only really have a GCSE understanding of physics, along with the odd thing I've learned here and there
Does anyone have a dummies guide of how COP works and how certain materials are able to achieve above 100% efficiency?
And why a GSHP can achieve a higher COP than an ASHP, as well as any limitations ie: is the COP of 3.5 on average for ASHP set in stone? Or could they get even better? If so, why so and if not, why not?
Does anyone have a dummies guide of how COP works and how certain materials are able to achieve above 100% efficiency?
And why a GSHP can achieve a higher COP than an ASHP, as well as any limitations ie: is the COP of 3.5 on average for ASHP set in stone? Or could they get even better? If so, why so and if not, why not?
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
What is Coefficient of Performance - COP - Heat Pump - Definition (thermal-engineering.org)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance
If my understanding is correct (and it seems to fit with what Wiki says) the issue is the temperature of the medium which is being drawn from. So and ASHP performs less well at lower outside temperatures - bringing the COP down. Therefore GSHPs achieve a higher COP simply because the temperature deep underground is higher.
There are others here who know far more than me so I'm happy to be corrected if I've got this wrong!
Install 2: Sept 19, 600W SSE
Solax 6.3kWh battery
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 2.5kw inverter. 28MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.
Now, the average air temp will vary a lot across the year, from hot in the summer to very cold in the winter, whereas the ground temp will vary less as it takes a long time to heat up or cool down. So in the winter the ground temp will (on average) be higher than the air temp, and hey presto, you get a better COP as the medium you are borrowing the heat from is warmer.
I assume that ASHP is more efficient in the summer, but since demand for DHW is much smaller than space heating + DHW (in the winter), GSHP still wins out, and will still of course have a good COP in the summer, just not as good as ASHP.
Addendum - Also need to consider the ground/soil. If it's extremely stable then you could cool it down with the GSHP and lose efficiency over the winter (whereas air circulates). If the soil is damp/wet, then the 'cold' can be transmitted away better. I think this is taken into account when the amount of pipework/coils/area is calculated.
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
I'd have liked a GSHP but they are a lot more expensive and disruptive to install.