We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Boiling water
Comments
-
Opinions please.0
-
More expensive than an ordinary kettle !
2 -
depends upon if you are only heating a single cup in a microwave v more in a kettle with a higher minimum level. Otherwise, as per coffehound.0
-
On average, in order to boil water, it takes:
- 1500W microwave: 1-1.5 min cup (250 ml) of water,
- 700-800W microwave: 2.5-3 min cup (250 ml) of water,
- gas stove: 6-8 min 1 liter (four 250 ml cups) of water,
- electric stove: 8-12 min 1 liter (four 250 ml cups) of water,
- induction cooktop: 5-6 min 1 liter (four 250 ml cups) of water,
- 1500W kettle: ~4 min 1 liter (four 250 ml cups) of water,
- 2500W kettle: 2-3 min 1 liter (four 250 ml cups) of water, etc.
https://www.batteryequivalents.com/how-long-does-it-take-for-water-to-boil.html
0 -
Put the kettle in the microwave, i have my microwave in my freezer and now it freezes and cooks.5
-
A quick Google suggests that microwaves aren't that efficient. Figures quoted of between 55% and 80%.
So from the example given above, an 800 watt output microwave could well be using 1000 to 1455 watts. I presume there must be heat generated from the magnetron as it creates the microwaves and that heat is expelled through the cooling fan rather than being forced into the oven.
A small kettle capable of heating just enough water for a cupful must surely then be more cost effective, since 100% of the energy is going into the heating element.
Or am I missing something?0 -
Get a hob kettle. and boil the exact quantity of water you need (weigh it) on the gas hob.Gas is still about 1/4 the price of electricity, so even if it were only 50% efficient, it would still be half price, but the waste heat warms the house reducing the heating bill anyway.I used a hob kettle for ages, until I read some clickbait about the myriad life threatening conditions caused by using the gas hob, now I've gone back to electric, but I still weigh out the exact amount of water required.I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science)
0 -
lohr500 said:A small kettle capable of heating just enough water for a cupful must surely then be more cost effective, since 100% of the energy is going into the heating element.
Or am I missing something?facade said:Get a hob kettle. and boil the exact quantity of water you need (weigh it) on the gas hob.1 -
Get a one cup water boiler ??0
-
BUFF said:No, but a lot of (most?) electric kettles have a minimum level requirement which may be 500ml-1000ml so you could potentially be heating a lot more water than you actually need.
I use a graduated jug to measure my 300ml rather than weighing it. Alternatively, one could just fill one's cup & decant that into the kettle..
I wonder what proportion of kettles in use today don't allow people to boil so little. The defining difference is I think whether a kettle has a flat bottom or a exposed coiled heating element - the latter needs to be covered with water and so sets a minimum fill level.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards