We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DIY laminate flooring - floorboard stuck!
Comments
-
Could easily just say "they".2
-
greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1 -
A bit of ambiguity is good in the language, lots of the best songs have some so we can all put our take on it.GDB2222 said:greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.
In the case of that piece of laminate "Something inside so strong" might be apt.Play with the expectation of winning not the fear of failure. S.Clarke2 -
Getting a bit off topic, but "they" is very commonly used to refer to just one person when the person is unknown. It's not a "new" usage.GDB2222 said:greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.
If you found someone's coat and bag on the train, would you try to return it to them? Would you do your best to make sure they were reunited with it by dropping it for them at the Lost Property office?
Or would you take his/hers bag and coat and give it to the guard so that he/she could locate it later?
One of those paragraphs works much better than the other.4 -
greensalad said:
Getting a bit off topic, but "they" is very commonly used to refer to just one person when the person is unknown. It's not a "new" usage.GDB2222 said:greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.
If you found someone's coat and bag on the train, would you try to return it to them? Would you do your best to make sure they were reunited with it by dropping it for them at the Lost Property office?
Or would you take his/hers bag and coat and give it to the guard so that he/she could locate it later?
One of those paragraphs works much better than the other.
But your examples do not contain the pronoun 'they' :-)
1 -
And when the person is known as well. Very common and has been for many years.greensalad said:
Getting a bit off topic, but "they" is very commonly used to refer to just one person when the person is unknown. It's not a "new" usage.GDB2222 said:greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.0 -
greensalad said:
Getting a bit off topic, but "they" is very commonly used to refer to just one person when the person is unknown. It's not a "new" usage.GDB2222 said:greensalad said:Could easily just say "they".
I do understand that the usage has changed over the years, but they is still usually used to refer to two or more people. Ideally, we need a new word that's not ambiguous.
If you found someone's coat and bag on the train, would you try to return it to them? Would you do your best to make sure they were reunited with it by dropping it for them at the Lost Property office?
Or would you take his/hers bag and coat and give it to the guard so that he/she could locate it later?
One of those paragraphs works much better than the other.
I agree it's off topic, but your laminate flooring problem has been solved, so there's nobody losing out.
The use of 'they' to refer to a known person is pretty recent usage. It's certainly occurred during the second half of my lifetime (I'm nearly 70, hence a bit set in my ways). It's a different usage where it refers to someone who is unknown.
There's nothing wrong with he/she, except it's a bit cumbersome. I'd be happy with a new word, "ze" perhaps. The word "Ms" caught on very quickly, so why not 'ze'? Or, maybe dinosaurs like me will die out, and the world will be left to the they generation?
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Multi-tool.
Done.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
