We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Chargeback,Section 75 Question

Options
2»

Comments

  • Sandtree
    Sandtree Posts: 10,628 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Just one final question on this.

    Assuming I win the small claims case and the cc company eventually credit me with the £1,000,do they then try and recover this from the merchant?  Or do they  suffer the loss themselves ?
    Out of banks pocket. It is not cost effective to recover funds from retailer. legal expenses far outweigh any return.
    Going off track and I dont dispute the answer and I am sure someone much brighter than I have come to that conclusion but I am surprised that its the answer. 

    Obviously my world is insurance and we constantly pursue third parties for fairly modest debts and its clearly financially viable for us. I dont know the types of volumes of S75 claims that are made per year but even if it were to small to keep a handful of recovery technicians busy there are plenty of outsources who do recovery work in exchange for 25% of what they recover so effectively no win no fee

    Feels like there is more of a legal hurdle than cost... insurance is clear that the insurer gets subrogated by settling the insured claim, maybe the waters are more muddy in banking/S75
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,102 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sandtree said:
    Feels like there is more of a legal hurdle than cost... insurance is clear that the insurer gets subrogated by settling the insured claim, maybe the waters are more muddy in banking/S75
    Yes, that would be my understanding - when a debtor is pursuing a creditor under CCA s75, the basis of the action is that this is as an alternative to pursuing to the supplier, given that both are equally liable, but a creditor choosing to accept that liability doesn't inherently introduce a debt for the supplier, and further legal action would be needed to enforce such recovery.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,423 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    @Sandtree
    I don't know if you will remember the breast implants that either leaked or burst years ago. I know one bank that paid out millions on S75 claims. 
    They stood the loss. While they could have sued the co involved. It was deemed that the cost to do so, would be far more than they would ever get back. Despite the company still trading.
    Life in the slow lane
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.