We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

This quote look ok?

Options
Hi everyone,

Like a lot of people I'm looking at a solar panel system...I'm a bit clueless.
Does this quote look about right:

22 x JA Solar (380 watts)
22 x Tigo Optimisers
1 x GivEnergy battery with BMS (8.2kwh)

£13,000


We use about 6500kw per year and have a southish facing roof, no shade

Thanks in advance
«1

Comments

  • Price looks around the going rate. Perhaps it could be around £1k cheaper? 

    Couple of notes:
    1) Check availability on the battery. There are reports on here of difficulty getting stock. Maybe consider Pylontech instead (?)

    2)the Tigo optimisers wouldn't be much benefit with no shading issues. Unless you want to monitor panel performance, in which case it is worth getting the Cloud Connect
  • 1961Nick
    1961Nick Posts: 2,107 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The price looks slightly on the high side of ok... but still ok.

    I'd be tempted to ditch the optimisers if you don't have any shading & spend the cash on a bigger battery... 3 x 5.2kWh or 2 x 8.2kWh.
    4kWp (black/black) - Sofar Inverter - SSE(141°) - 30° pitch - North Lincs
    Installed June 2013 - PVGIS = 3400
    Sofar ME3000SP Inverter & 5 x Pylontech US2000B Plus & 3 x US2000C Batteries - 19.2kWh
  • 1961Nick said:
    The price looks slightly on the high side of ok... but still ok.

    I'd be tempted to ditch the optimisers if you don't have any shading & spend the cash on a bigger battery... 3 x 5.2kWh or 2 x 8.2kWh.
    I like the idea of seeing how each panel is doing. I was told if I don’t go for that you can’t tell which panel is faulty etc
  • Verdigris
    Verdigris Posts: 1,725 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I was told if I don’t go for that you can’t tell which panel is faulty etc

    Or it could be interpreted as making life easy for the installer, should a panel develop a fault, at your cost.

  • Verdigris
    Verdigris Posts: 1,725 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    With no shading I think I might consider two inverters. With two strings each, that would be a maximum of 6 panels on a string. It would still make it easy to identify a faulty panel and not lose too much energy whilst you're waiting for it to be fixed. Assuming that was cheaper, spend the difference on more batteries, as previously suggested.
  • 1961Nick
    1961Nick Posts: 2,107 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The chances of a panel becoming faulty are slim, but if it did happen, you'd be able to narrow it down to one string (11 panels). Hire of a scaffold & the cost of the replacement panel would be a very large proportion of the cost. Knowledge of which panel out of the 11 is faulty isn't going to save a great deal.

    More battery storage will probably earn enough to pay for an unlikely faulty panel.
    4kWp (black/black) - Sofar Inverter - SSE(141°) - 30° pitch - North Lincs
    Installed June 2013 - PVGIS = 3400
    Sofar ME3000SP Inverter & 5 x Pylontech US2000B Plus & 3 x US2000C Batteries - 19.2kWh
  • thorn22 said:
    1961Nick said:
    The price looks slightly on the high side of ok... but still ok.

    I'd be tempted to ditch the optimisers if you don't have any shading & spend the cash on a bigger battery... 3 x 5.2kWh or 2 x 8.2kWh.
    I like the idea of seeing how each panel is doing. I was told if I don’t go for that you can’t tell which panel is faulty etc
    The flip side of this is you are adding another 22 things to go wrong on your roof. The jury is out on whether optimisers are more or less likely to go wrong then panels.
  • Spies
    Spies Posts: 2,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    From one quote I had, I was steered away from them because of that very reason.
    4.29kWp Solar system, 45/55 South/West split in cloudy rainy Cumbria. 
  • Verdigris
    Verdigris Posts: 1,725 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Yes, panels are pretty reliable but at least a conventional inverter goes wrong somewhere reasonably accessible!
  • thorn22 said:
    1961Nick said:
    The price looks slightly on the high side of ok... but still ok.

    I'd be tempted to ditch the optimisers if you don't have any shading & spend the cash on a bigger battery... 3 x 5.2kWh or 2 x 8.2kWh.
    I like the idea of seeing how each panel is doing. I was told if I don’t go for that you can’t tell which panel is faulty etc
    The flip side of this is you are adding another 22 things to go wrong on your roof. The jury is out on whether optimisers are more or less likely to go wrong then panels.
    Sorry to quote myself. I should add that I went for optimisers on our panels. The only shading is from the roofs of houses as the sun sets/rises. But I was keen to geek out on the data 

    I have been amazed how much difference there has been between the highest and lowest positioned panels on the roof this winter. Without optimisers the string would be dragged down. I reckon they have have increased output by about 20%. I expect the difference will be less, for the rest of the year, with the sun higher in the sky.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.