We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
dogs in cars
Comments
-
Jenni_D said:UncleZen said:I bought a simple dog seat belt. It clips onto the dogs collar and the other end goes in the seatbelt socket. Its stops them moving about too much and secures them in the event of an accident0
-
I use a harness and have a seatbelt clip for a Springer Spaniel. As well as that, I have a dog seat cover in the car which slips over the headrests forming a hammock like scenario. This stops the dog being catapulted off the seat when braking hard.I have to admit it always frightens me when I see dogs in the boot of cars.0
-
UncleZen said:Jenni_D said:UncleZen said:I bought a simple dog seat belt. It clips onto the dogs collar and the other end goes in the seatbelt socket. Its stops them moving about too much and secures them in the event of an accident
Result strangulation and/or broken neck.4 -
Car_54 said:UncleZen said:Jenni_D said:UncleZen said:I bought a simple dog seat belt. It clips onto the dogs collar and the other end goes in the seatbelt socket. Its stops them moving about too much and secures them in the event of an accident
Result strangulation and/or broken neck.Jenni x0 -
here is an example of how a do is propelled forward in a car crash.
Restrained by his collar would have dire consequences
https://www.wired.com/2013/10/dog-harness-safety/
1 -
Obviously. I really mean compared to being unrestrained. Even though I didnt make that clear.
Even though I said, collar in my original post, I did update it to say harness that you failed to notice.
But, some restraint is better than no restraint isnt it.
0 -
To be fair you updated your post well after I had made my previous comment.
Some restraint is better than no restraint - yes, for the human occupants in the front of the vehicle. But a restraint via a collar is terrible for the dog itself. (Which was the point being made, on your post prior to the edit).Jenni x1 -
Jenni_D said:To be fair you updated your post well after I had made my previous comment.
Some restraint is better than no restraint - yes, for the human occupants in the front of the vehicle. But a restraint via a collar is terrible for the dog itself.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Jenni_D said:To be fair you updated your post well after I had made my previous comment.
Some restraint is better than no restraint - yes, for the human occupants in the front of the vehicle. But a restraint via a collar is terrible for the dog itself. (Which was the point being made, on your post prior to the edit).2 -
Car_54 said:I think most humans would opt for no restraint rather than a noose ...
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards