We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Discrepancy in budget
gridsset
Posts: 22 Forumite
Good morning, please forgive me if this isn't the right category for my query, I couldn't find a more appropriate one.
In 2019 we bought a flat (leasehold) which is in an estate where there is a mix of 12 flats in 2 blocks and 8 houses.
We never gave too much attention to the terms of the lease until one of our flats residents brought to our attention that according to how the budget was split, the flats were to pay 75% of the management fee contrary to the terms of the lease that say that the management fee is to be paid in equal shares by the whole estate budget (in which flats contribute).
To be more precise, there are 2 micro budgets, in the estate budget we all chip up (houses and flats), then there is a flats only.
We have noticed that until 2007 the management fee has always been charged equally, then from 2008 (when the new managing agent took over), the management fee was charged 75/25 between flats and houses for no apparent reason.
When we signed the contract to buy the flat there wasn't any footnote and the lease still says the management fee is to be charged equally on the estate budget.
Could you please help me to understand whether what I am thinking is right?
Thanks in advance for your time and help.
In 2019 we bought a flat (leasehold) which is in an estate where there is a mix of 12 flats in 2 blocks and 8 houses.
We never gave too much attention to the terms of the lease until one of our flats residents brought to our attention that according to how the budget was split, the flats were to pay 75% of the management fee contrary to the terms of the lease that say that the management fee is to be paid in equal shares by the whole estate budget (in which flats contribute).
To be more precise, there are 2 micro budgets, in the estate budget we all chip up (houses and flats), then there is a flats only.
We have noticed that until 2007 the management fee has always been charged equally, then from 2008 (when the new managing agent took over), the management fee was charged 75/25 between flats and houses for no apparent reason.
When we signed the contract to buy the flat there wasn't any footnote and the lease still says the management fee is to be charged equally on the estate budget.
Could you please help me to understand whether what I am thinking is right?
Thanks in advance for your time and help.
0
Comments
-
I'm not 100% clear what you mean, but it looks like there's an issue.Can you* quote the relevant section of your lease, and also* confirm whether all the other flats' leases are the same, and* quote the relevant part of the houses' leases (if they are leasehold) orTitles (if freehold).Can you also quote the relevant parts of the latest budget.0
-
Thanks for the messagecanaldumidi said:I'm not 100% clear what you mean, but it looks like there's an issue.Can you* quote the relevant section of your lease, and also* confirm whether all the other flats' leases are the same, and* quote the relevant part of the houses' leases (if they are leasehold) orTitles (if freehold).Can you also quote the relevant parts of the latest budget.
The section of the lease says
The service charge for each accounting period is 3.51% of the items listed in section 6 (costs to which all flats and houses contribute: cost of services, reserve fund, insurance, accounting fee, management fee, recruitment and dismissal costs, interests, statutory requirements)
All the other flats have the same lease, the only difference is that 2 bed have 3.51% and 3 bed have 5.27% as % to pay for the estate service charge l
I don't know whether the houses are leasehold or freehold.
0 -
So are you being asked to pay 3.51% of the management fee?
0 -
No, as they have split the management fee it appears that I will have to pay 5.34%.canaldumidi said:So are you being asked to pay 3.51% of the management fee?0 -
That's pretty standard when there is a mix of houses and flats. I would assume you have services the houses don't, like communal cleaning and maintenance, therefore the extra is to cover the work to deal with all that0
-
Thanks for your point.Racky_Roo said:That's pretty standard when there is a mix of houses and flats. I would assume you have services the houses don't, like communal cleaning and maintenance, therefore the extra is to cover the work to deal with all that
I don't have any objection to what you say, however it needs some backing. There is no clause in the lease, no contract with the management agents that says otherwise, neither a written agreement among the shareholders.
Also, there were budgets from 2005 that show the management fee being charged to the estate equally and not 75/25 flats houses.
0 -
Where I own flats there are two components to the service charges, namely block expenses and estate expenses. I pay different percentages for the two, but I get one bill.That’s normal, as I would expect the flat owners to pay for maintenance of the fabric of their own blocks, and the house owners for their own individual expenses.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1
-
This is what happens to us too.GDB2222 said:Where I own flats there are two components to the service charges, namely block expenses and estate expenses. I pay different percentages for the two, but I get one bill.That’s normal, as I would expect the flat owners to pay for maintenance of the fabric of their own blocks, and the house owners for their own individual expenses.
For instance, we all pay the right % for gardeners, estate sinking funds and everything that is shared among everyone, however we are charged almost twice the management fee.0 -
So it appears that the separation of charges is probably 'fair', but that the leases were not drawn up to reflect that.Unless there is more in the lease than what has been quoted (and one always has to read them fully) it looks like the charge could be challenged.2
-
Thank youcanaldumidi said:So it appears that the separation of charges is probably 'fair', but that the leases were not drawn up to reflect that.Unless there is more in the lease than what has been quoted (and one always has to read them fully) it looks like the charge could be challenged.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
