We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gaming laptop broken - less than 3 years old
Comments
-
Maybe not but it gives everyone an excuse to ignore the problemSandtree said:
Opening the case cannot breach your statutory rights thoughJumblebumble said:
The big problem here is that Lenovo are adamant that if the case is opened up that will void any warranty.unholyangel said:OP, what exactly does the report state? How often did you service your laptop (clean out the build up of dust, check thermal paste etc)?
Retailer can quite easily maintain it was sold with a warranty and the manufacturer should fix
Retailer can also say the user opened the case and if the heatsink had evidence of being removed to check thermal paste would I imagine easily be able to state
The heatsink was removed by a non approve service agent . The chip fried. Therefore the heatsink would not have been correctly reinstalled to Lenovo standards
0 -
It could be fair to argue someone without knowledge in the area, such as the consumer, could have caused damage by opening the case.Jumblebumble said:
Maybe not but it gives everyone an excuse to ignore the problemSandtree said:
Opening the case cannot breach your statutory rights thoughJumblebumble said:
The big problem here is that Lenovo are adamant that if the case is opened up that will void any warranty.unholyangel said:OP, what exactly does the report state? How often did you service your laptop (clean out the build up of dust, check thermal paste etc)?
Retailer can quite easily maintain it was sold with a warranty and the manufacturer should fix
Retailer can also say the user opened the case and if the heatsink had evidence of being removed to check thermal paste would I imagine easily be able to state
The heatsink was removed by a non approve service agent . The chip fried. Therefore the heatsink would not have been correctly reinstalled to Lenovo standards
However a term implying a consumer was only entitled to a remedy if any inspection (or repair*) was carried out by an agent approved by the retailer would be unfair as it would remove impartiality.
*where that repair was undertaken by the consumer's choice of agent as the trader had failed to offer a remedy.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
And a MOSFET chip tends not to have a heatsink, so removing and replacing the CPU heatsink/thermal paste is a red herring.

Jenni x1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

