Claim form from UK Parking Control LTD

John919

Le_Kirk said:

John919 said:

The dDriver informed the defendant that they arrived at 5.30am to at the gym and parked the vehicle at in a parking bay which, at the time the driver believed to belong to Pure gym. Later research proved that the parking bay marking was misleading as 1/3rd of lanes were painted in white and 2/3rd in yellow, which would not have been well very visible at 5.30am as it was still dark.

Maybe adjust as above.  However, your paragraph 4 goes on to state that the defence all comes from your own knowledge, which is not true if you are being told the sequence of events by the driver.

Driver and defendant is same person

John919

The driver arrived at 5.30am at the gym and parked the vehicle at in a parking bay which, at the time the driver believed to belong to Pure gym.Two gyms use the same parking yard but it simply isn't clear where to park for each and customers of both gyms are being penalised unfairly.  There is no barrier, fence or prominent delineation.Later research proved that the parking bay marking was misleading as 1/3rd of lanes were painted in white and 2/3rd in yellow, which would not have been well very visible at 5.30am as it was still dark.

John919

2. It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper and driver of the vehicle in question but liability is denied. 

Le_Kirk

John919 said:

Le_Kirk said:

John919 said:

The dDriver informed the defendant that they arrived at 5.30am to at the gym and parked the vehicle at in a parking bay which, at the time the driver believed to belong to Pure gym. Later research proved that the parking bay marking was misleading as 1/3rd of lanes were painted in white and 2/3rd in yellow, which would not have been well very visible at 5.30am as it was still dark.

Maybe adjust as above.  However, your paragraph 4 goes on to state that the defence all comes from your own knowledge, which is not true if you are being told the sequence of events by the driver.

Driver and defendant is same person

John919 said:

The driver defendant arrived at 5.30am at the gym and parked the vehicle at in a parking bay which, at the time the driver defendant believed to belong to Pure gym.  Two gyms use the same parking yard but it simply isn't clear where to park for each and customers of both gyms are being penalised unfairly.  There is no barrier, fence or prominent delineation.  Later research proved that the parking bay marking was misleading as 1/3rd of lanes were painted in white and 2/3rd in yellow, which would not have been well very visible at 5.30am as it was still dark.

John919 said:

2. It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper and driver of the vehicle in question but liability is denied. 

On the basis that you are defending as driver, you can change "driver" to "defendant".  Where I have edited your text using a strikethrough, it is my intention that you remove that word and substitute it for the one in bold.  Note also that there is a space after a full stop.

John919

Evening everyone, not sure if anyone can advice on dcb legal ltd email. Claimants legal representative name known 

KeithP

John919 said:

Evening everyone, not sure if anyone can advice on dcb legal ltd email. Claimants legal representative name known 

Sorry I don't understand the question.
Are you asking for someone to interpret an email you have received? If so, you'll need to show it to us.

John919

Not sure where to send defence 1 copy sent to CCBCAQ@Justice.gov.uk and second copy to parking firm's legal team or solicitors
Found few, should I send it to all?

Yasmin@dcblegal.co.uk

info@dcblegal.co.uk

Paul@dcblegal.co.uk

Danielle@dcblegal.co.uk

Coupon-mad

Yes, send it to all of them and keep 'em busy.

John919

Hi everyone, emailed to CCBCAQ@Justice.gov.uk ,but not received acknowledgement,is it good idea to send it again or should I just wait,thanks

John919

Sent it twice and never received any acknowledgement only from dcb legal