County Court Claim with Highview/DCB Legal

Umkomaas

Mcmerta said:

Umkomaas said:

Onto another point, it says on the letter that each party must deliver to the other party and the court of any document which the party intends to rely on by no later of 4pm on 21st April. I am right to assume that at the later stage all I need to submit is the WS? The defence was filed a while ago so only this needs to be done now?

It means your WS and Evidence Bundle (and the Claimant's) must be filed with the court, and a copied to the Claimant (their solicitors) by 4pm 21st April.  You should also receive the Claimant's WS and Evidence Bundle by the same date. 

Thank you, working on it all as we type!

That's good. Don't submit it too early as that gives the Claimant the opportunity to rebut things you put in your WS. Without missing the deadline, wait to see if you receive the C's WS beforehand, then you'll get the opportunity to have a 'pick' at theirs. But do not miss the submission deadline!

Mcmerta

Hi all.

I have drafted a Witness Statement, using someones as a template. Please feel free to destroy it, I havnt added the exhibits just yet but the text is in place.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v6chizrbabcdl2l/WSREDACTED.odt?dl=0

I have also attached a picture of what I mean in point #8 to help you understand what I am trying to say.

Thanks again

B789

You may want to add "and research" to the end of para #1 to pre-empt the usual slanderous accusations by the PPC/solicitors that you are just an ignorant man on the Clapham Omnibus with no legal training and have just copied and pasted your information with no appreciation of what the contents say or mean.

In Para #8, you mention "...which upon a SAR request of the car park operator's information...". Your SAR would not have revealed this information as a SAR only provides information and data held about you. Did you mean your PAP rebuttal or request for more information after the LoC?

1505grandad

A heads-up  -  check spelling of "EXHIBIT"

Mcmerta

B789 said:

You may want to add "and research" to the end of para #1 to pre-empt the usual slanderous accusations by the PPC/solicitors that you are just an ignorant man on the Clapham Omnibus with no legal training and have just copied and pasted your information with no appreciation of what the contents say or mean.

In Para #8, you mention "...which upon a SAR request of the car park operator's information...". Your SAR would not have revealed this information as a SAR only provides information and data held about you. Did you mean your PAP rebuttal or request for more information after the LoC?

Thanks for your input.

In reference to Para #8, I did a standard SAR request and it was included on the info sent to me.

I have changed to wording in Para #8 to

"Where the signs for “Permit Holders Only” are posted, there is no distinguished change to the car park for example, no barriers or gates, no change to the road surface or change to the bays of parking. I feel that this is in fact all the same area of car park, which upon a SAR request of my held data about myself, an aerial image of the car park is provided, they also mark it all as 1 area and labelled as “Public Car Park”, so therefore, it stands to reason that the 1st terms and conditions apply for all of the car park."