We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Electric Radiator Costs. Leave on or off?

I have three electric radiators in my two bed property that's electric only. It's not well insulated so it can lose heat quick.

The rads have a thermostat on them so when it reaches the temperature, it will turn off and only kick back in to heat the room back up to that temperature.

I was wondering if it would be more cost effective to leave the electric radiators ticking on at 18° or set them up on a timer to kick in at certain hours (0600-0800 / 1800-2200)

Theoretically in my head, it will spend less time/use less kwh to keep ticking on at 18° than to be constantly on for the several hours it takes to bring my room/house from a low temperature to 18° every morning and evening. Is that right?

Any experience or knowledge would be grateful.

Comments

  • QrizB
    QrizB Posts: 15,512 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Welcome to the forum.
    I was wondering if it would be more cost effective to leave the electric radiators ticking on at 18° or set them up on a timer to kick in at certain hours (0600-0800 / 1800-2200)
    Theoretically in my head, it will spend less time/use less kwh to keep ticking on at 18° than to be constantly on for the several hours it takes to bring my room/house from a low temperature to 18° every morning and evening. Is that right?
    Any experience or knowledge would be grateful.
    It's the other way around.
    It will take less energy to bring it up again to 18C than it would to keep it at 18C permanently.
    Your property loses less heat when the property is colder. If it was as cold indoors as outdoors, it wouldn't lose any heat at all.
    N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Shell (now TT) BB / Lebara mobi. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
    2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 33MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.
    Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.
    Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
  • markin
    markin Posts: 3,860 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If you own the flat or can get the landlord to do it the advice would be to insulate better and use night storage heaters on E7 tarrif.
    Are the currently any worth while E7 tariffs?  or are you already on one and heating in the day on expensive day rate power?
  • Aylesbury_Duck
    Aylesbury_Duck Posts: 15,178 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I have three electric radiators in my two bed property that's electric only. It's not well insulated so it can lose heat quick.

    The rads have a thermostat on them so when it reaches the temperature, it will turn off and only kick back in to heat the room back up to that temperature.

    I was wondering if it would be more cost effective to leave the electric radiators ticking on at 18° or set them up on a timer to kick in at certain hours (0600-0800 / 1800-2200)

    Theoretically in my head, it will spend less time/use less kwh to keep ticking on at 18° than to be constantly on for the several hours it takes to bring my room/house from a low temperature to 18° every morning and evening. Is that right?

    Any experience or knowledge would be grateful.
    No, use the timers.  Think of it like a kettle.  You wouldn't think it economical to keep your kettle simmering away at boiling point so it's always ready to make a cup of tea - you'd boil the water when you want the drink.  This is not much different.  If you leave heating of any type on when you don't really need it, it will cost more than only putting it on when you do.
  • I have three electric radiators in my two bed property that's electric only. It's not well insulated so it can lose heat quick.

    The rads have a thermostat on them so when it reaches the temperature, it will turn off and only kick back in to heat the room back up to that temperature.

    I was wondering if it would be more cost effective to leave the electric radiators ticking on at 18° or set them up on a timer to kick in at certain hours (0600-0800 / 1800-2200)

    Theoretically in my head, it will spend less time/use less kwh to keep ticking on at 18° than to be constantly on for the several hours it takes to bring my room/house from a low temperature to 18° every morning and evening. Is that right?

    Any experience or knowledge would be grateful.
    No, use the timers.  Think of it like a kettle.  You wouldn't think it economical to keep your kettle simmering away at boiling point so it's always ready to make a cup of tea - you'd boil the water when you want the drink.  This is not much different.  If you leave heating of any type on when you don't really need it, it will cost more than only putting it on when you do.
    Ah okay, that's a good point. Thanks for replies. Maybe it was just the placebo in my head that came up with the idea.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 348.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 241.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 617.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.8K Life & Family
  • 254.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.