We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Subsidence risk due to history of Brine Pumping

We're at the very final stage of purchasing a house in East Cheshire. All searches came back and this flagged a moderate to high risk of ground subsidence due to a history of Brine Pumping a long time ago. We we're asked to order a Cheshire Salt Search which confirmed that "a notice of damage was flagged in February 1959 and an inspection of the property revealed evidence of damage through subsidence due to bring pumping and compensation was paid out".

The house we're buying was built in the 1970s and the current owner has lived there for more than 10 yrs so assuming the subsidence damage in 1959 was a previous house that was since demolished. From our eyes, the house visually looks in very good condition with no signs of cracks or damage when we visited twice. We're expecting the home buyers survey report today but wondered if anyone else has had a similar issue and what did you do? Thanks

    Comments

    • Just to add that the current owner has confirmed through their solicitor to our solicitor in writing that there has been no evidence of subsidence in the time they've lived at the property (more than 10 yrs). 
    • Mahsroh
      Mahsroh Posts: 776 Forumite
      Tenth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
      Wait and see what comes back from the survey but i'd say it's unlikely to have any impact, particularly as you say, the existing house was built in the 70's.

      We had a similar (ish) thing where one of the searches came back basically saying our house had been built on the site of an old swamp! We took the view that the house was built in the 1930's and as it's been standing for circa 90 years, there was unlikely to be an issue with the stability of the land under it..... particularly when no structural issues were raised in the survey. 
    • user1977
      user1977 Posts: 19,550 Forumite
      Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
      I don't see the relevance of the 1950s claim - new house, different foundations etc.
    Meet your Ambassadors

    🚀 Getting Started

    Hi new member!

    Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

    Categories

    • All Categories
    • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
    • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
    • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
    • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
    • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
    • 178.5K Life & Family
    • 261.7K Travel & Transport
    • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
    • 16K Discuss & Feedback
    • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

    Is this how you want to be seen?

    We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.