CST Law LBC

Le_Kirk

The data you receive as a result of your SAR is exactly that, YOUR data.  What they rely on in court will/should be far more and you will only see that at witness statement time.

patient_dream

xHarlanx said:

patient_dream said:

At least the email admits they have the records because they have chaecked them.

As said they must provide strict proof 
They may show a judge the logs but only a redacted copy otherwise it would be a data breach 

THey must also prove beyond doubt that the machone was working.  AND if they were on to prove their case, why do they refuse to show you the logs and then go on to waste the time of a judge

This is the normal rubbish we see from Smart and CST

Many thanks for the feedback, It is my understating that they must send me all evidence that they will be using in court as per my SAR so surely they can't reject my request for redacted data but then show a judge with it redacted?

I must admit that what we see about CST LAW, they are all mouth and no trousers and doomed to failure.

If you read the CST Group thread, you will see that after all the bluster and threats nothing happened.  They thought they could take Scotland by storm on behalf of UKPC and that really was a damp squib and then the SRA investigated them ?   A Judge would not put up with their rubbish and nor should you

CST letters' forum group thread

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1