We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
High house prices rising in working class areas, is it fair and is there anything that can be done?
Comments
-
Section62 said:RMiller95 said:
It is excessive when you look at how much they actually make per property and how big the site is.Then beat the developers at their own game.Buy a building plot. Buy your own materials. Build your own house.Then bank the excessive profit you think there is in housebuilding.(Warning: You may be disappointed with the result)This applies to lots of things in life.0 -
[Deleted User] said:Shaztastic3000 said:Sounds like you should move to a South American socialist countryCan get very cheap houses in Sweden, outside the major cities. Trouble is everything else there is expensive! High excise duties and VAT at 25% on almost everything. And fancy a 1 hour round trip to buy a bottle of wine (can't buy alcohol over 3.5% in normal shops, have to go to a state run supermaket and you won't find them in small towns/villages).I love Sweden in small doses but not sure I could live there.0
-
RMiller95 said:Daveyjp,
It is excessive when you look at how much they actually make per property and how big the site is. I could understand if it was a smaller amount but the house prices are already inflated as a result of the market which is fair enough, but the inflated price should cover the increase in materials instead of capitalising on a bleak situation for new and first time buyers.
Those are not big numbers at all, though they are just about acceptable it's not great for what is supposedly a roaring housing market. You could almost make an argument that the shareholders of Barratts would be better served by the management stopping building any houses and putting all the money into stock market investments in other companies, though I don't think you would quite win it.
When people look at profit margins, they forget that the really important thing is how much resources you need to put into a business in order to earn that profit, not the margin itself. If you make a widget for £1 and sell it for £10, you might think you have a good money making scheme. But if I told you the equipment to make 100 widgets cost a million quid, you wouldn't bother. So it is with housebuilding, although it isn't so much the equipment that's the problem (that can be leased) but the vast sums required to buy land and then spend years ploughing through multiple iterations of the planning cycle before you get permission to build something commercially sensible. Plus then of course things like materials, until you get to the point where you can sell houses off-plan.
Besides, the vast majority of the profit in housing development comes from getting planning permission on previously non-developable land anyway. You earn a modest margin from building, but really that's just an efficient way to monetise the planning gains you have made.
If you want cheaper houses, then the most effective thing you could do on the supply side is to liberalise the planning system. A quarter-acre of agricultural land costs (relative) peanuts, and building a basic house is not too expensive either. Actually building (or buying) a property is within reach of couples even on very modest incomes on those terms. But as a society we have decided not to do that for the time being, and so have introduced artificial scarcity. It's up to all of us to decide if the trade-offs are correct.
This is perhaps a less true in the non-urban centre north where land values are a bit cheaper and build efficiency is more of a factor, but it still is a major factor.1 -
daveyjp said:RMiller95 said:Daveyjp,
It is excessive when you look at how much they actually make per property and how big the site is. I could understand if it was a smaller amount but the house prices are already inflated as a result of the market which is fair enough, but the inflated price should cover the increase in materials instead of capitalising on a bleak situation for new and first time buyers.0 -
Murphybear said:daveyjp said:RMiller95 said:Daveyjp,
It is excessive when you look at how much they actually make per property and how big the site is. I could understand if it was a smaller amount but the house prices are already inflated as a result of the market which is fair enough, but the inflated price should cover the increase in materials instead of capitalising on a bleak situation for new and first time buyers.
Gross profit on building tends to be lower than a third in most budgets, maybe something like 20% through a cycle unless you hit a bad project. But it varies massively, often due to house price movements.
It can take a year or two to complete a development, and if you contract materials early on in the process and have land prices on the books anywhere from 2-7 years' prior (given how slow the planning system moves) then the construction margin on the development can get way, way higher than what is budgeted. But it's not really the 'true' economic profit as it doesn't account for the opportunity cost of just selling the land for the updated value instead.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards