We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

No service charge, maintenance on as and when basis

Hi. If a leasehold property has ground rent but no service charge, and the maintenance is deemed payable on an as and when basis decided by the freeholder, with the cost being split between leaseholders, this sounds more precarious than what I would expect in terms of service charges, managed maintenance and hopefully a sink fund.

Am I missing something please? 

Comments

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,172 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 January 2022 at 12:05PM

    It works ok for lots of properties.

    It reduces the amount of admin involved in managing the property, which means you don't have to pay for that admin through the service charge.

    The important question is whether the freeholder does a good job of repairs and maintenance, and whether leaseholder's have a good record of paying promptly.

    For example, if a leaseholder reports a leaking roof, does the freeholder act swiftly to get quotes, and do the other leaseholders pay their share quickly - so that the roof can be quickly repaired?

    I guess there's also the question of how emergency repairs are handled - e.g. if the communal front door falls off its hinges and is insecure. Will the freeholder pay for repairs and reclaim, or insist that the leaseholders pay first - resulting in the property being insure in the meantime?



    Sinking funds have their pros and cons. Unless the sinking fund is managed by a competent professional management company (with indemnity insurance etc) I think I'd prefer not to have one.


  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 7 January 2022 at 1:39PM
    @edddy Thank you, great information to consider. I appreciate your advice and points of importance.
  • We used to live in a leasehold apartment with two other leaseholders. Whenever there was a repair that affected the building, we would each provide 2-3 quotes and then choose the contractor to carry out the work, then split the invoice three ways. We chose the Gardener and would split the grounds maintenance and communal lighting charge three ways.

    It CAN work but only if the leaseholders in the building are responsible and willing to pay when repairs are needed. You might want to look into what happens when a leaseholder can't or won't pay. Make sure your Solicitor goes through each clause of the lease with you thoroughly BEFORE you purchase the property. All the best. 
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,302 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 January 2022 at 2:10PM
    It is the money-saving option, after all - better to look after your own "rainy day" fund than pay into somebody else's bank account which you might never get any benefit from.

    For some perspective (and I know there are other differences), this is the norm for flats in Scotland, at least as far as any significant costs are concerned, and people don't run screaming away from it. The risk is of course that not everybody else can (or will) pay up immediately when money is needed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.