We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Take Mortgage at 1.4% Fixed Interest Rate for 2 Years or 1.7% Fixed for 5 Years?

A friend of mine has been offered a mortgage by Halifax with two fixed term options:

1.4% Fixed for 2 Years

1.7% Fixed for 5 Years

The decision depends on how much mortgage borrowing interest rates might increase by.

Which option would you say is best?

Thank you.

Comments

  • If interest rates stay the same or go above 1.7% in the next 5 years, the 2 years one. If they go above 1.7%, the 5 year one.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    How much is the peace of mind worth?  0.3% is a small differential to pay. Against the possibility that rates might increase sharply. For context BOE would regard a normal base rate as being in the range 3.5% - 4.5%.  We are currently still in an abnormal period. 


  • pjcox2005
    pjcox2005 Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I would say if you can get a large chunk of a mortgage paid off whilst interest is below 2% then you've done very well. We fixed for 5 years last time and probably lost out slightly but peace of mind and again 10 years now around 2% is more than you would have ever anticipated.
  • No brainer the 5 year fix.  As rates certainly can only going one way.   
  • I guess it depends on what you think will happen in the next few years. 

    Not just with interest rates, but moving home or wanting to pay a big chunk of it off in the next 2 years. 

    I would have normally gone with the 5 year for just piece of mind, but as I'm nearer paying off my mortgage and want to make several lump payments towards my mortgage over the next couple of years, I would go for the 2 year one. 
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,630 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mikeprice said:
    Which option would you say is best?

    I'll let you know in 5 years...

    When I took out my mortgage, it was usual for people to take out the cheapest 2 year deal and then take another cheapest 2 year deal. However my two year deal ended in 2008 & that strategy would appear to not have paid off.

    However I was able to then get a lifetime tracker at 0.4 above base, although it had a collar & so it was great but not amazing.

    If I'd originally taken out a 5 year tracker then I'd have paid more and not been able to get a 2.something% interest rate for the next ten years. By the time there were better fees, I'd practically paid the mortgage off & so the fees outweighed any saving.

    In hindsight I could have invested the money rather than overpaying, but I liked certainty.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.3K Life & Family
  • 253.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.