We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Taking large parcel delivery company to small claims. One bit of advice please
Comments
-
Many companies will offer a 'goodwill gesture', and pay the full amount but will not admit liability. To do so would open them up to a flood of claims from people in a similar situation. My suggestion would be to go back to them and say you want your additional costs - court costs etc as well. If they cover all your costs, take it and get it over with. Taking it forward on a point of principle is fine if you can afford to lose in court.
1 -
Thanks. No moral crusade, but admission seems important (as lay person with no previous experience), as a "goodwill" offer, with no timeframe stated seems tenuous. Theres an online court messaging system for communication, and to terminate the process, but they diverted to email. My concern was that. Thanks for all the contributions and advice here. Much appreciatedemmajones1976 said:If it gets to court and they find out you have refused an offer of full and final settlement, it isn't going to look good as it is a waste of everyones time.
If they are paying out in full, 100% of the money (inc. the court filing fee), take it. Now. Continuing to pursue it merely as a moral crusade is your problem and nobody elses, and in any case they may not even admit anything anyway.0 -
The small claims court isnt about admitting liability. Its about getting your money back (or not).1
-
Well, the timeframe for the payment is "before it gets to court" - if they can't manage to pay by then, you proceed as intended.petere123 said:
No moral crusade, but admission seems important (as lay person with no previous experience), as a "goodwill" offer, with no timeframe stated seems tenuous.emmajones1976 said:If it gets to court and they find out you have refused an offer of full and final settlement, it isn't going to look good as it is a waste of everyones time.
If they are paying out in full, 100% of the money (inc. the court filing fee), take it. Now. Continuing to pursue it merely as a moral crusade is your problem and nobody elses, and in any case they may not even admit anything anyway.1 -
If they don't pay up. You take the matter to court. It's as basic as that. No need to second guess their motives or intentions.petere123 said:
Thanks. No moral crusade, but admission seems important (as lay person with no previous experience), as a "goodwill" offer, with no timeframe stated seems tenuous. Theres an online court messaging system for communication, and to terminate the process, but they diverted to email. My concern was that. Thanks for all the contributions and advice here. Much appreciatedemmajones1976 said:If it gets to court and they find out you have refused an offer of full and final settlement, it isn't going to look good as it is a waste of everyones time.
If they are paying out in full, 100% of the money (inc. the court filing fee), take it. Now. Continuing to pursue it merely as a moral crusade is your problem and nobody elses, and in any case they may not even admit anything anyway.1 -
Its unimportant unless you have further heads of claim you wish to add later.petere123 said:
Thanks. No moral crusade, but admission seems important (as lay person with no previous experience), as a "goodwill" offer, with no timeframe stated seems tenuous. Theres an online court messaging system for communication, and to terminate the process, but they diverted to email. My concern was that. Thanks for all the contributions and advice here. Much appreciatedemmajones1976 said:If it gets to court and they find out you have refused an offer of full and final settlement, it isn't going to look good as it is a waste of everyones time.
If they are paying out in full, 100% of the money (inc. the court filing fee), take it. Now. Continuing to pursue it merely as a moral crusade is your problem and nobody elses, and in any case they may not even admit anything anyway.
You agree to it and just say you will discontinue the process once you've cleared funds in your account.2 -
Excellent advice re not overthinking itThrugelmir said:
If they don't pay up. You take the matter to court. It's as basic as that. No need to second guess their motives or intentions.
Thanks very much 1 -
To all who replied; Thanks very much for comments, advice and for taking the trouble to do so.
Amazing help. Cheers
1 -
Perhaps they are afraid that you will then start on the subject of consequential loss.petere123 said:Hi. Issued small claims court proceedings re non-delivery.
Months of no comms from courier until they received court docs.
They responded by email to offer full amount as "gesture of goodwill" and deny responsibility.
Sick of being lied to. Probably why they did so by email.
Reply, or tell them to only communciate via court online process ?. ie where they cant lie.
I want an admission of liabilty then my money, not just my money.
Thanks for any help
What good does any admission of liability do you in any event?
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
