We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Death In Service Payment - Very Naive Question
100% debt-free!
Comments
-
Whilst employed, you don't need to be on the premisesMake £2023 in 2023 (#36) £3479.30/£2023
Make £2024 in 2024...1 -
Though it is possible that they pay more if you actually die while at work. (colleagues at my last job had a pact that if necessary they'd drag the other's body into the office to qualify for the higher payout...)1
-
If NHS death in service, I wouldn't trust it. I would rely on a product you know would pay out regardless of location or job at the time if you do other NHS/private work
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/family-refused-nhs-death-in-service-payout-after-gp-dies-on-day-off-wzqctqlsblm
"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP1 -
I thought it worth by-passing the Times paywall to provide the gist of the case csgohan is referring to;-
"As reported in this week’s edition of the FT Adviser, a weekly publication from the Financial Times, the ombudsman said “…although it appeared that she was engaged in a regular pattern of work at the time of her death, she was self-employed and because she died on a day when she was in-between working, the small print of the NHS Pension Scheme meant she was not in pensionable employment at the time of her death.”
For a GP partner, or a salaried GP pensioning their income as a Type 2 Practitioner in the NHS Scheme, a far more generous death-in-service benefit would have applied, since the individual is deemed as being in pensionable income 24/7. Where as for a GP locum in the NHS Pension Scheme, the full benefits may only apply if they die at work.
FT Adviser also goes on to say that ‘[High Court] Judge Justice Trower said: “In the present case, I do not consider that it is possible to say that Dr Sanderson was still engaged under a contract for services at the time of her death.”
I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.5 -
I'm imagining a more imaginative/contrarian judge saying, "She was employed at time of death, so she can have the DiS payout, but as she was not really self-employed, her estate owes the exchequer year upon year of NI payments."kingstreet said:I thought it worth by-passing the Times paywall to provide the gist of the case csgohan is referring to;-"As reported in this week’s edition of the FT Adviser, a weekly publication from the Financial Times, the ombudsman said “…although it appeared that she was engaged in a regular pattern of work at the time of her death, she was self-employed and because she died on a day when she was in-between working, the small print of the NHS Pension Scheme meant she was not in pensionable employment at the time of her death.”
For a GP partner, or a salaried GP pensioning their income as a Type 2 Practitioner in the NHS Scheme, a far more generous death-in-service benefit would have applied, since the individual is deemed as being in pensionable income 24/7. Where as for a GP locum in the NHS Pension Scheme, the full benefits may only apply if they die at work.
FT Adviser also goes on to say that ‘[High Court] Judge Justice Trower said: “In the present case, I do not consider that it is possible to say that Dr Sanderson was still engaged under a contract for services at the time of her death.”
0 -
Thanks Kingstreet,
but shocking behavior and worming their way out of claiming sadly. That's why I wouldn't trust employer death in benefits unless it was iron clad in your favor
Basically one would need to die on the job to have any chance of 100% claiming which is sad. What I do in my free time, be it free lancing or watching paint dry shouldn't have any baring on a claim"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
Any death in service benefit should always been seen as a bonus. Anyone with dependents to protect needs to have their own life insurance that will always payout regardless of whether they are working or not.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0
-
I didn't think they paid out in the case of suicide?tacpot12 said:Any death in service benefit should always been seen as a bonus. Anyone with dependents to protect needs to have their own life insurance that will always payout regardless of whether they are working or not.
---
100% debt-free!0 -
This will always be explained in contracts of employment. Read the small print. My last job didn't offer this. At all. So if any job does, that is a bonus, as tacpot12 says and something to be grateful for, no matter how small the sum.Please note - taken from the Forum Rules and amended for my own personal use (with thanks) : It is up to you to investigate, check, double-check and check yet again before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my posts. Although I do carry out careful research before posting and never intend to mislead or supply out-of-date or incorrect information, please do not rely 100% on what you are reading. Verify everything in order to protect yourself as you are responsible for any action you consequently take.0
-
Doesn't that depend on the terms and conditions of any policy?Saga said:
I didn't think they paid out in the case of suicide?tacpot12 said:Any death in service benefit should always been seen as a bonus. Anyone with dependents to protect needs to have their own life insurance that will always payout regardless of whether they are working or not.
Seems a bit old-fashioned and discriminatory to me.Please note - taken from the Forum Rules and amended for my own personal use (with thanks) : It is up to you to investigate, check, double-check and check yet again before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my posts. Although I do carry out careful research before posting and never intend to mislead or supply out-of-date or incorrect information, please do not rely 100% on what you are reading. Verify everything in order to protect yourself as you are responsible for any action you consequently take.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


