We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vanguard - personalised service
Options
Comments
-
Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.0 -
vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.2 -
jim8888 said:vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.0 -
vulcanrtb said:jim8888 said:vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.
There is a consensus that the outlook for bonds is not great, and most bond funds have gone down this year , some by as much as 8%.
So the normal assumption that VLS 20 is 'safer ' than VLS40, may well not hold true in the future .
Personally I am reasonably cautious/conservative but in the last year I have increased my equity % a little ( despite some signs of frothiness in the stock markets , especially in the US) and reduced my bond % by more . Filling the gap with alternatives like infrastructure funds, more cash etc.
Of course it may turn out to be a bad move but it does seem in line with general investment trends.2 -
Albermarle said:vulcanrtb said:jim8888 said:vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.
There is a consensus that the outlook for bonds is not great, and most bond funds have gone down this year , some by as much as 8%.
So the normal assumption that VLS 20 is 'safer ' than VLS40, may well not hold true in the future .
Personally I am reasonably cautious/conservative but in the last year I have increased my equity % a little ( despite some signs of frothiness in the stock markets , especially in the US) and reduced my bond % by more . Filling the gap with alternatives like infrastructure funds, more cash etc.
Of course it may turn out to be a bad move but it does seem in line with general investment trends.0 -
Some will wince at this and take me to task, maybe, but it's all just gambling isn't it?
The shorter the time frame involved the more like gambling it is . The longer the time frame then I suppose it is still gambling, but with the odds heavily weighted in your favour .
Long-term investing: Increasing your chances of positive returns (nutmeg.com)
0 -
vulcanrtb said:Albermarle said:vulcanrtb said:jim8888 said:vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.
There is a consensus that the outlook for bonds is not great, and most bond funds have gone down this year , some by as much as 8%.
So the normal assumption that VLS 20 is 'safer ' than VLS40, may well not hold true in the future .
Personally I am reasonably cautious/conservative but in the last year I have increased my equity % a little ( despite some signs of frothiness in the stock markets , especially in the US) and reduced my bond % by more . Filling the gap with alternatives like infrastructure funds, more cash etc.
Of course it may turn out to be a bad move but it does seem in line with general investment trends.
When interest rates are expected to rise and inflation is going up, the asset values of fixed interest securities falls and the yield increases. We appear to be at the stage where the low risk stuff is more likely to lose value over the next decade. The yield will increase and that will compensate somewhat but all indications are that the short term is likely to see short to medium term losses on 80% of your fund is you go with VLS20.
(simplified the explanation to avoid going to technical).I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
DoublePolaroid said:Philosophically it’s interesting Vanguard offer this service. Their motto, given their founding and business model, might as well be if you can’t beat the market, buy the market (unless you pay us 0.5% apparently) and their USP, such as it is, is offering no frills, do-it-all-for-me investments for people who are keen to fire and forget.0
-
dunstonh said:vulcanrtb said:Albermarle said:vulcanrtb said:jim8888 said:vulcanrtb said:Thanks for the feedback all. I guess you could pidgeon-hole me as a nervous investor, the pot is >700K but I don't need to touch it (drawdown) for probably 2 years, I retired in July.
I have a webchat booked with Vanguard to learn more in general, not just their personalised service.
There is a consensus that the outlook for bonds is not great, and most bond funds have gone down this year , some by as much as 8%.
So the normal assumption that VLS 20 is 'safer ' than VLS40, may well not hold true in the future .
Personally I am reasonably cautious/conservative but in the last year I have increased my equity % a little ( despite some signs of frothiness in the stock markets , especially in the US) and reduced my bond % by more . Filling the gap with alternatives like infrastructure funds, more cash etc.
Of course it may turn out to be a bad move but it does seem in line with general investment trends.
When interest rates are expected to rise and inflation is going up, the asset values of fixed interest securities falls and the yield increases. We appear to be at the stage where the low risk stuff is more likely to lose value over the next decade. The yield will increase and that will compensate somewhat but all indications are that the short term is likely to see short to medium term losses on 80% of your fund is you go with VLS20.
(simplified the explanation to avoid going to technical).
Anyway, I'll do further research but the trend I'm reading here is that a higher ration of equities is probably a better 'bet'.
0 -
vulcanrtb said:I'm still undecided between VLS20 and VLS40 (or even 60), you've given me pause for thought, so thanks.The long term return on bonds can be mathematically calculated and at current valuations is generally now under 1% which is obviously below inflation. Equities, even at current valuations (expensive in the US but cheaper than bonds), should give you long term returns above inflation (with ups and downs along the way) and even if they fail to achieve such returns should still do better than bonds.Obviously it depends on your drawdown strategy but I would be very concerned if you were going into a long retirement drawdown with less than 60% equities unless you for some reason accepted that inflation would materially reduce your spending power over time. So yes if you were otherwise thinking of VLS20/40 then paying for some financial advice would probably be a good use of money.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards