Dcbl - tracing service

D_P_Dance

... now and repeating £170 required to prevent further action.  

They have added what appears to be an extra unlawful amount for debt collection. Judges have dismissed an entire claim because of this. Read this and complain to your MP.

Excel v Wilkinson

At the Bradford County Court, District Judge Claire Jackson (now HHJ Jackson, a Specialist Civil Circuit Judge) decided to hear a 'test case' a few months ago, where £60 had been added to a parking charge despite Judges up and down the country repeatedly disallowing that sum and warning parking firms not to waste court time with such spurious claims.   That case was Excel v Wilkinson: G4QZ465V, heard in July 2020 and leave to appeal was refused and that route was not pursued.  The Judge concluded that such claims are proceedings with 'an improper collateral purpose'.   This Judge - and others who have since copied her words and struck dozens of cases out in late 2020 and into 2021 - went into significant detail and concluded that parking operators (such as this Claimant) are seeking to circumvent CPR 27.14 as well as breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   DJ Hickinbottom has recently struck more cases out in that court area, stating: ''I find that striking out this claim is the only appropriate manner in which the disapproval of the court can be shown''.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/16qovzulab1szem/G4QZ465V%20Excel%20v%20Wilkinson.pdf?dl=0

Also read this

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6279348/witness-statements-2-transcripts-re-parking-firms-false-costs-recorder-cohen-qc-judgment-2021/p1

Mrsoverall

Yet another.  This time says ‘notice of intended legal action’.  I’m assuming this is just another attempt to obtain payment but would be grateful for confirmation.  Thanks 

KeithP

To refresh your memory, please just re-read the replies you have already received.  

Did you follow the advice offered by @Coupon-mad on 31 October 2021 at 4:18PM?

patient_dream

Mrsoverall said:

Yet another.  This time says ‘notice of intended legal action’.  I’m assuming this is just another attempt to obtain payment but would be grateful for confirmation.  Thanks 

HAHA ,   DCBL always say that ..... it's how they operate.  par for the course to get you to pay

Are they clever or smaart .... don't think so ... have a read

WHAT A JUDGETHINKS ABOUT A DCBL CLAIM AND WHY THEY LOST

7 January at 4:15PM  7 January at 4:40PM    <<<<< CLICK

And the famous DCBL CAR CRASH FOR VCS
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6308128/vcs-caught-issuing-pcns-on-public-highway-hit-for-1-000-counterclaim/p1

See what DCBL do next

Mrsoverall

KeithP, thanks - yes followed to the letter and received confirmation from their DPO that details amended,  sorry for checking, it’s just the NI aspect that made me wonder as all the advice/comments relate to GB. Thanks again