We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

DB Pension transfer..a no brainer?

C_Mababejive
C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
 still contributing to a DB pension. Also have a SIPP with about 60k in it.
Transfer value circa £1m, no dependents.

Transfer seems a no brainer. Am i missing anything?
Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
«1345678

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 25 October 2021 at 10:22PM
    Someone needs to manage the £1m of investments.........

    You are also very close to the LTA. 
  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,438 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Besides the treatment for a DB pension scheme is far more generous than a DC pension scheme under LTA.
  • Aged almost 60, still contributing to a DB pension. Also have a SIPP with about 60k in it.
    Transfer value circa £1m, no dependents.

    Transfer seems a no brainer. Am i missing anything?
    Maybe, maybe not.

    But we're missing what you would be giving up in return for the £1million

    £10k/year with no lump sum might make it very attractive.

    £50k/year inflation proofed with £150k PCLS less so
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I cant say exactly without checking but benefit to date might be around 24k pa without taking a TFLS. I'm aware of my close proximity to the LTA and i dont fully understand the implications and any actions i might be able to take to mitigate it. Just keep the SIPP fully invested and march on/make money or seek to throttle gains in the SIPP? Marching on seems the better option?
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,438 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 October 2021 at 10:41PM
    Do you even need the money? A pension of £24k plus state pension is quite a comfortable income already! Even more, if it is index-linked.

    *sighs*, I really need to find a job with a DB pension scheme.  :D
  • What's the normal pension age for it ?
    It would seem getting them transferred is a problem.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    edited 26 October 2021 at 6:38AM
    I cant say exactly without checking but benefit to date might be around 24k pa without taking a TFLS. I'm aware of my close proximity to the LTA and i dont fully understand the implications and any actions i might be able to take to mitigate it. Just keep the SIPP fully invested and march on/make money or seek to throttle gains in the SIPP? Marching on seems the better option?
    The LTA calculation values a DB pension as 20X the annual income plus the lump sum.  So it would seem you are well below the LTA.




  • ukdw
    ukdw Posts: 380 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 October 2021 at 7:36AM
    If your CETV multiple is >40x then definitely worth considering, even if it pushes you into LTA territory. LTA implications can be taken into account by reducing multiple a little bit to take into account the lost 25%.

    If investments hold up long term, then at a 40x multiple, you would probably be able to drawdown at least 50%-75% more than would be available from your DB, plus probably also have a much larger tax free lump sum available.

    The main downsides to transferring are finding and paying for an IFA who can be convinced to give you a positive recommendation.  Then if successful, having to think a fair bit more about investment risks and drawdowns levels, tax etc. for the rest of your life, including occasional stress during market downturns!
    Plus if unsuccessful having to pay quite a bit of money out of taxed savings for the negative recommendation.

    Alternatively, If you take the DB you will pretty much be able to completely forget about pensions and investments for the rest of your life as long as the DB is enough and inflation doesn't breach any DB limits by too much.  You may however have the occasional 'what if I had taken the CETV?' reflections!
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 30,953 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    I cant say exactly without checking but benefit to date might be around 24k pa without taking a TFLS.

    I would suggest it is a good idea to get a firmer handle on this figure .

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.