We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Return deposit
Comments
-
Maybe the son is thinking that he put £2500 in at the start to get a better car at the same monthly payments as the average one, and deserves his £2500 back from the equity of the better car that wouldn't exist otherwise.I think the sharing the equity in the same proportion as money actually paid is the fairest though as already suggested.There is nothing like family and money to cause problems....I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science
)2 -
Is car under finance?
Is he the main driver on Insurance?
Just offer to give him the £2.5K back & say. Right you can now need to go & buy your own car, as you can no longer drive this one. Bet that will focus his mind...Life in the slow lane0 -
You haven't taken into account the disparity on the mileage. If you take thumbs suck of 7p per mile (about standard) that is about £1,300-£1,500 the son should lose assuming a three year contract.Grumpy_chap said:This seems like a car part-owned by son and part-owned by parent. Use of the car is shared. Parent pays the insurance. Ignore the differential use of the car and the insurance contribution - put that down to parental support.
It is not clear how long the car has been owned, so I'll assume three years. That would mean:
Son paid £2,500 plus 36 x £200 = £9,700 = 37.5% of total paid
Parent paid 36 x £450 = £16,200 = 62.5% of total paid
Total Paid £25,900
When the car is sold, parent gets 62.5%, son gets 37.5%
Assuming I understood the situation correctly, that seems simple enough to me.
I would also assume the parent paid some of the deposit which needs accounted for.0 -
I agree, but we don't have that figure. The same principal can be easily applied by the OP with full figures.Flight3287462 said:I would also assume the parent paid some of the deposit which needs accounted for.
You are correct.Flight3287462 said:You haven't taken into account the disparity on the mileage.
I did try to cover that with my commentGrumpy_chap said:Ignore the differential use of the car and the insurance contribution - put that down to parental support.
0 -
I matched the deposit. Pay road tax which is higher than normal due to car being high value and I also pay full comp insurance for us both and any service.0
-
Have you been asked who the main driver is? What answer did you give?DelSan said:I matched the deposit. Pay road tax which is higher than normal due to car being high value and I also pay full comp insurance for us both and any service.0 -
I haven’t been asked0
-
I have him named as main driver since he drives it the most.0
-
Thanks all for your thoughts. They’ve been very helpful. I’d like to close this post now0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards