We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Power consumption heat pump
Options
Comments
-
Reed0
-
Reed_Richards said:0
-
Reed_Richards said:BikingBud said:
Legacy, inefficient, gas boilers never had the complex control systems that are common now.
In 1998 I bought a gas boiler that was condensing, could modulate and also did both weather and load compensation. It annoys me that in 2020 I bought a heat pump that was not capable of the latter control feature. I subsequently found out that Viessmann heat pumps using a Viessman controller can do this but why on earth is it not standard?
In 2003 we had gas powered wet underfloor heating driven by a Viessman boiler that coped with temps down to -25 deg C automatically, this was in Munich with a well insulated house. So we both recognise that the control systems were available. I cannot account for the fact that you purchased a system that did not have this widely available technology but this is different to not being capable.
0 -
shinytop said:Reed_Richards said:shinytop said:
I’ve just had MMSP monitoring installed and although it’s not quite up and running yet, it is giving some data. This is the heating only energy consumption from my ASHP for 3 hours last night. It starts at 6pm. It’s about 10 C outside and the flow temp is about room temperature in the high teens. I manually switched the thermostat up at just before 6:30. It seems to increase energy use in steps until it gets to the flow temp it wants. It then lets it drop a bit before slowly increasing. It then seems to find a level at which it can maintain flow temp. Sometime after 8, the thermostat stops calling for heat and the flow temp drifts down.This doesn’t look like an unmodulated on/off situation.
The failing of this control system, as I see it, is that when the heat pump is modulating its output between 18:45 and 20:15 it does not know if it is adequately heating the room/house or not. So it takes from 18:30 until 20:15 for your room to reach its desired temperature. I would have it override the 40 C weather control setting to take the flow water hotter whilst there is a big difference between the room and the set temperature but then use a lower flow temperature than 40 C when the room reaches its set temperature in order to maintain that temperature.
" In room temp. (Auto adaptation) mode the controller uses temperature sensors around the heating system to monitor space and flow temperatures. This data is regularly updated and compared to previous data by the controller to predict changes in room temperature and adjust the temperature of water flowing to the space heating circuit accordingly. By monitoring not only the outdoor ambient, but the room and heating circuit water temperatures, the heating is more consistent and sudden spikes in required heat output are reduced. This results in a lower overall flow temperature being required."
I could do this now but the wired in control unit with the room temperature sensor is currently in the cupboard with the tank so I'd have to move it outside or use Mitsubishi's own wireless stats, which apparently do communucate room temps back to the central unit. They are a hundred quid each or so but with the price of electricity they might pay for themselves. Whether this will heat the room quicker or be cheaper or both I don't know though.
I think when the thermostat stops calling for heat, everything stops part from a very little background stuff. When the ASHP decides its flow temps are high enough (e.g. after my first high peak), it's still using some power - I assume it's still pumping water around but not heating it, hence the rapid drop in flow temp.
On your current set up the flow temp response curve looks fairly smooth, with the energy also settling fairly quickly indicating a well damped system but with the auto-adaption the system should "learn" and should reduce the oscillations in energy use, ideally (for economy) you would hit the flow temp requirement without the overswing. But rapid response time and economy are often conflicting demands.
It would be good to compare that to a typical short cycle response and see how the energy trace differs.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards