We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice request - buying house with foul sewer pipes

2»

Comments

  • Bump 

    Grateful for advice, thank you. 
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 10,300 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Bump 

    Grateful for advice, thank you. 
    Sorry, I missed your post the other day.

    I would say 1920 is about right.  The piecemeal development of the road is a bit of a curveball and makes it open to some doubt as it is possible the construction was a bit later but to an earlier design.

    Another source of information worth having a look at is the Historic England archive of aerial photos.
    https://www.britainfromabove.org.uk/

    Usually that would be a very long shot, but you've got more chance than most as Aerofilms were based in North London and very active in the 1920's and 1930's.

    It might also be worth checking the 1939 Register (on Ancestry or Find My Past) which gives details of people living in properties on a street-by-street basis.  If the property was built by September 1939 then there should be an entry - although where individuals might be still living their records are redacted so it can take some detective work to figure out whether a property exists or not.  If you go down that route and need some help then just ask.  I believe both family history sites have a trial membership option, but if you are a library member you may be able to get free access to both at a local library, or in some cases use Ancestry at home.

    If only you could wait a few months the 1921 census is due for release early next year!

    A further curveball is London is one of the places where there are some Section 24-type sewers from as late as the mid-1960's.

    Having building control sign off is a plus.  I have to admit to being very surprised at that as London Boroughs and Thames Water are usually quite strict about build over of sewers.

    I think the house being built where an old road is shown needs more investigation - it is possible it was only an access track or the like. So I wouldn't get unduly concerned that you are dealing with a large sewer until more information is known.
  • Hi everyone

    We have recently had a CCTV survey of the sewers completed and I'd be grateful for your thoughts on whether we should proceed with the purchase. 

    There are five manholes at the property - four inside the house and one in the front driveway. The company performing the survey could only gain access to one manhole inside and the one outdoors. The report confirmed that they are foul sewers and outdoors one has an interceptor. The pipes that were reviewed required work (grades 3 and 4, although 4 is for lateral flow pipes) and the main sewer has fractures that need to be lined in the "medium term".

    This is making us very hesitant to proceed with the purchase. The amount of remedial work on the sewers appears non-trivial which we are concerned would be disruptive. And there is uncertainty about the condition of the pipes leading to the other manholes that were not surveyed

    We also do not know whether a build over agreement would have been required and what the sewage company would do if the manholes are inaccessible. Break the floors presumably.

    Finally, the planning documentation does not mention that there is a foul sewer under the extension, so we are not sure whether they got the right sign off/oversight from building control. 
  • Wow, I’m bet your glad you got the CCTV survey. The vendors probably worried it would find issues making sale difficult & indemnities are often of limited use.

    I would avoid this house. It has potentially disruptive maintenance issues and a lot of uncertainty about hidden issues that could cause a lot of hassle. 

    If it was your forever home at a good price you could consider buying, if you’re aiming to renovate, gut, future proof etc.
    if it’s a short term house then it may well be a big pain to sell and the price may fall if e.g a drain collapses 

    hopefully you can find something else
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.