We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Stamp duty question / second property ?

My mum passed earlier this year, my Dad is main beneficiary in the will. They both have a clause in their will to show that their half of the property is then held by the three executors/trustees, my Dad, brother and myself. Land registry papers are being drawn up to this effect.
I am in the process of looking for my own property following divorce, living with family until then.
does the land registry paperwork re the above mean that when I buy a property that I have to pay extra stamp duty?

Comments

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,050 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    SR24 said:
    My mum passed earlier this year, my Dad is main beneficiary in the will. They both have a clause in their will to show that their half of the property is then held by the three executors/trustees, my Dad, brother and myself. Land registry papers are being drawn up to this effect.
    I am in the process of looking for my own property following divorce, living with family until then.
    does the land registry paperwork re the above mean that when I buy a property that I have to pay extra stamp duty?

    The link canaldumidi sent is helpful, assuming the property you will buy is in England.  The link shows that even if, by the date you complete the purchase of a property, you have acquired a share in your parents' property, it will not "count against" you for the purposes of the 3% surcharge to stamp duty land tax for three years.  Here are some points:

    (a)  This assumes that your share is not over 50%.
    (b)  The three year clock only starts when you acquire an interest in the property.  That is typically when there is an "assent" or an "appropriation".
    (c)  The rules are different if you would otherwise be a first time buyer for SDLT.  There is no three year rule there to help you.
  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Thank you both so much for your advice @canaldumidi and @SDLT_Geek

    @SDLT_Geek
    Yes it is in England and my share is less than 50%. 
    By Assent.
    My future property purchase is not as FTB

    Hopefully I will have bought my new property within 3 years, but with the current property market who can tell 🙄!

    So after the three years from date of assent, any future property purchases myself or my brother might make would result in higher SDLT?

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,050 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    SR24 said:
    Thank you both so much for your advice @canaldumidi and @SDLT_Geek

    @SDLT_Geek
    Yes it is in England and my share is less than 50%. 
    By Assent.
    My future property purchase is not as FTB

    Hopefully I will have bought my new property within 3 years, but with the current property market who can tell 🙄!

    So after the three years from date of assent, any future property purchases myself or my brother might make would result in higher SDLT?

    Perhaps, but there is an exception if you are "replacing" your only or main residence.  There are a number of conditions to be met to count as "replacing" a residence; one of which is that a previous main residence has been sold (or otherwise disposed of). 
    So generally, a person selling their former home and buying a new one, does not pay the extra 3% SDLT even though they own another property.
  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    @SDLT_Geek

    Thank you, so if I don’t buy my ‘new’ property within the 3years after assent I will be due to pay higher rate SDLT.

    If I do buy it within 3 years then I won’t pay higher rate SDLT on that transaction, and then if/when in future (3years plus) I sell my ‘new’ property/home and buy a new property/home than that is classed as replacing my main residence and higher rate SDLT won’t apply.

    Have I understood this correctly please?

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,050 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    SR24 said:
    @SDLT_Geek

    Thank you, so if I don’t buy my ‘new’ property within the 3years after assent I will be due to pay higher rate SDLT.

    If I do buy it within 3 years then I won’t pay higher rate SDLT on that transaction, and then if/when in future (3years plus) I sell my ‘new’ property/home and buy a new property/home than that is classed as replacing my main residence and higher rate SDLT won’t apply.

    Have I understood this correctly please?

    Yes, that is correct, on the rules as they stand now.
  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Thank you @SDLT_Geek

    appreciate your time sharing your knowledge 
  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 14 March 2022 at 2:25PM
    @SDLT_Geek @canaldumidi

    Hi, I am buying my property (alt last!) and have advised my conveyancing solicitor that I do not believe I need to pay the higher tax rate based on the link provided in this thread and the subsequent posts.

    The sols have emailed me to say they do not give tax advice and they are at liberty to pay what I instruct them to pay to HMRC. 
    They attached a document they have at their office and highlighted a few points and asked me how I wish to proceed.

    The points they make are :-
    1) Anyone who buys an additional residential property for more than £40k (which of course I am) and already has a share in another property of £40k or more (I estimate my share in the inherited property, a third of 50%, is currently worth £50k)
    2) If I was replacing my main residence the 3% surcharge would not apply. I sold my main residence in 2020 as part of divorce and am living with family since. They have highlighted that my situation is not replacing my main residence as I am no longer an owner or co-owner of that property as it has been sold.

    I feel that even though the above two points are facts in my situation, that my understanding from your posts and the link from HMRC in particular this section below - negates my obligation to pay 3% higher

    Where a person becomes entitled to such an interest in the three years before a chargeable transaction, the interest can be ignored for the purposes of determining whether the transaction is a higher rates transaction [Para 16(2)] provided that:

    • the beneficiary became a joint owner of the interest by inheritance [Para 16(1)],
    • the beneficiary and any spouse or civil partner’s combined interest has not exceeded half of the major interest in the three years before the effective date of the chargeable transaction [Para 16(4)].

    Please can you confirm if this is the case. Thanking you in advance.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,050 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    SR24 said:
    @SDLT_Geek @canaldumidi

    Hi, I am buying my property (alt last!) and have advised my conveyancing solicitor that I do not believe I need to pay the higher tax rate based on the link provided in this thread and the subsequent posts.

    The sols have emailed me to say they do not give tax advice and they are at liberty to pay what I instruct them to pay to HMRC. 
    They attached a document they have at their office and highlighted a few points and asked me how I wish to proceed.

    The points they make are :-
    1) Anyone who buys an additional residential property for more than £40k (which of course I am) and already has a share in another property of £40k or more (I estimate my share in the inherited property is currently worth £50k)
    2) If I was replacing my main residence the 3% surcharge would not apply. I sold my main residence in 2020 as part of divorce and am living with family since. They have highlighted that my situation is not replacing my main residence as I am no longer an owner or co-owner of that property as it has been sold.

    I feel that even though the above two points are facts in my situation, that my understanding from your posts and the link from HMRC in particular this section below - negates my obligation to pay 3% higher

    Where a person becomes entitled to such an interest in the three years before a chargeable transaction, the interest can be ignored for the purposes of determining whether the transaction is a higher rates transaction [Para 16(2)] provided that:

    • the beneficiary became a joint owner of the interest by inheritance [Para 16(1)],
    • the beneficiary and any spouse or civil partner’s combined interest has not exceeded half of the major interest in the three years before the effective date of the chargeable transaction [Para 16(4)].

    Please can you confirm if this is the case. Thanking you in advance.
    Yes, confirmed.  The three year grace period for inheriting a share not exceeding 50% seems to apply to you, as previously thought.

    If that did not help you for some reason, then the "replacement of main residence rules" might still help you, I do not agree with the bit in bold above.  There is three year period from selling an old home within which to buy a new home.
  • SR24
    SR24 Posts: 35 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    @SDLT_Geek

    Thank you, it is really helpful to have a second set of eyes and more experience in these matters.

    I will go back to my solicitor and advice the inheritance less than 50% is my main reason for exemption in this case as per the original excerpt from HMRC manual.

    I will also quote the following, as I agree with you there is the three year rule of selling and buying main residence - covered I believe by  https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09800 

    SDLTM09800 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings: Condition D - general - Para 3(6) Sch 4ZA FA2003 

    Thank you for your time again, this is greatly appreciated

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.