We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Once you've "won the game"
Options
Comments
-
Audaxer said:Langtang said:Following on from this post: https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6301953/once-youve-won-the-game
We're fortunate to have just received an inheritance which, along with our own savings, will lead to a comfortable retirement for the next 35 years (very basic: savings / 35 years = comfortable+)
We've never invested (except ISA's) , but are in the process of (potentially) doing so with the help of an IFA.
We're not adverse to investing, but worry about "corrections" more than I think we'd worry about inflation depreciation. I say "we" but my wife scored higher than me in the risk profile we completed with the IFA, which surprised me.
I wonder if it is worth starting to "invest" or if it's better to just keep the money "ticking over" with enough to cover inflation?
The last time we spoke to him, we mentioned about not retiring until March 2023 - I'm not sure how that will affect how he has planned out our investment strategy. @dunstonh should we mention this to him prior to our meeting?
Thanks to this forum, and its amazing contributors, I've purchased Tim Hale's book, smarter investing. It's a great book - tough read for someone who has never invested, but a worthwhile read. I've also been reading Monevator regularly.bostonerimus said:Thrugelmir said:Be interesting to see which strategies best ride the choppy waters that lie ahead.
This is the kind of thing that worries me, when someone mentions choppy waters just as we're starting our investment journey. I know that waiting is "timing the market" and that doesn't work, but it's worrying nevertheless.
It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end....1 -
As an aside, I notice that my thread has been amalgamated with this one now. I was initially going to post on here, but it seemed to me that it would have been construed as hijacking someone else's post. Thanks to whoever merged them.It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end....1
-
MK62 said:This all started with my post stating that there is currently no guaranteed way to protect a pot of money from the effects of inflation - that's not the same as saying there are no ways of doing it at all - they just aren't guaranteed, which is what the OP was asking. Equities are one possibility but nobody needs telling that this approach is not guaranteed.......gilts...no....linker gilts...no.......
1 -
MK62 said:Malthusian said:There is one guaranteed way actually - buy an inflation-linked annuity. "Money" can mean "income" as well as "capital". If you buy an inflation-linked annuity then you will have the same amount of money to spend month-to-month for the rest of your life and that money will keep pace with inflation.You have to forfeit a very large amount of potential income as well as the option of passing on (most of) the capital on your death, but the option's there.0
-
MK62 said:Interesting mathematical game.....Assume a 60yo had access to an index linked savings account, into which he pays £100k (pot 1).At the same time, he/she also buys an index linked annuity for £100k, at current levels, and pays the income from that (assume tax free) into another pot (pot 2) in the same savings account. How many years would it take before pot 2 overtakes pot 1?In the above, pot 1 would represent a guaranteed way to protect £100k from inflation.....pot 2 represents the "buy an index linked annuity" approach.......So you want to compare a fantasy account which doesn't exist with something that does at current ratesPointless mathematical game. May as well compare a savings account paying 10% interest with the current levels of savings account interest.Yields on index linked gilts are negative, so index linked annuities wouldn't be expected to return the full pot after inflation.1
-
MK62 said:Deleted_User said:Protecting a pot of money is good for the pot. Protecting a standard of living is good for retiree. All depends on priorities.Deleted_User said:Aside from that, index linked annuities are not competitively priced. You can buy a flat annuity or an annuity which escalates at a fixed rate. And you would never start receiving payments at 60, even if you buy an annuity at that age.I agree, RPI linked annuities aren't competitively priced, at the moment at least, unless the worst case scenario comes to pass, which the annuity provider has planned against and then priced such annuities accordingly.However, those are what were being talked about.......As for flat rate annuities......there is no inflation protection in those at all - in the above scenario, that £15k might become £20k at the start......but assuming the purchaser makes 70, he/she might be regretting such a purchase by then.Deferred annuities?.......perhaps, as long as you have alternative means to live off in the meantime......though I'm still not sure what inflation guarantees such an annuity would offer......This all started with my post stating that there is currently no guaranteed way to protect a pot of money from the effects of inflation - that's not the same as saying there are no ways of doing it at all - they just aren't guaranteed, which is what the OP was asking. Equities are one possibility but nobody needs telling that this approach is not guaranteed....gilts...no....linker gilts...no....gold no....corporate bonds...no....retail savings...no...commodities....no.....lottery tickets, premium bonds et al...only if you win....
.
I'm happy to be corrected if someone knows of a guaranteed way of course.........if so it might well mean I've "won the game" too.....The whole point of several posts above is that is no guaranteed way. All "risk free" investments will yield less than inflation. So there is no guaranteed way to preserve your pot of money, if that's your "game". So nobody has won that "game", if winning is defined as OP implies, as being able to stop taking risk.If your "game" is you want a certain income for life, then if you have enough in your pot to buy an index linked annuity paying that income, then you have won that "game". Otherwise, you have to keep playing.So on your figures above, take a "win" with £10k for life, or carry on playing (ie taking risks) with £15k for now but possibly more, less, or none in the future.
3 -
Langtang said:Audaxer said:Langtang said:Following on from this post: https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6301953/once-youve-won-the-game
We're fortunate to have just received an inheritance which, along with our own savings, will lead to a comfortable retirement for the next 35 years (very basic: savings / 35 years = comfortable+)
We've never invested (except ISA's) , but are in the process of (potentially) doing so with the help of an IFA.
We're not adverse to investing, but worry about "corrections" more than I think we'd worry about inflation depreciation. I say "we" but my wife scored higher than me in the risk profile we completed with the IFA, which surprised me.
I wonder if it is worth starting to "invest" or if it's better to just keep the money "ticking over" with enough to cover inflation?
The last time we spoke to him, we mentioned about not retiring until March 2023 - I'm not sure how that will affect how he has planned out our investment strategy. @dunstonh should we mention this to him prior to our meeting?
Thanks to this forum, and its amazing contributors, I've purchased Tim Hale's book, smarter investing. It's a great book - tough read for someone who has never invested, but a worthwhile read. I've also been reading Monevator regularly.bostonerimus said:Thrugelmir said:Be interesting to see which strategies best ride the choppy waters that lie ahead.
This is the kind of thing that worries me, when someone mentions choppy waters just as we're starting our investment journey. I know that waiting is "timing the market" and that doesn't work, but it's worrying nevertheless.
Just think back over your lifetime about the big "events" that have affected markets and then look at the return graphs for a world index say - the events are small blips.
OK that needs a decent timeframe to work but you are hopefully planing on another 25-40 years of life ahead of you and not planning on spending all the investments in 2024 say!2 -
JohnWinder said:MK62 said:This all started with my post stating that there is currently no guaranteed way to protect a pot of money from the effects of inflation - that's not the same as saying there are no ways of doing it at all - they just aren't guaranteed, which is what the OP was asking. Equities are one possibility but nobody needs telling that this approach is not guaranteed.......gilts...no....linker gilts...no.......0
-
Deleted_User said:JohnWinder said:MK62 said:This all started with my post stating that there is currently no guaranteed way to protect a pot of money from the effects of inflation - that's not the same as saying there are no ways of doing it at all - they just aren't guaranteed, which is what the OP was asking. Equities are one possibility but nobody needs telling that this approach is not guaranteed.......gilts...no....linker gilts...no.......
Sure there is a cost for this protection which means that the real value of the protected sum is lower than the current value of the pot used to purchase this protected forever sum but is that unexpected that you have to pay for protection?I think....0 -
michaels said:Deleted_User said:JohnWinder said:MK62 said:This all started with my post stating that there is currently no guaranteed way to protect a pot of money from the effects of inflation - that's not the same as saying there are no ways of doing it at all - they just aren't guaranteed, which is what the OP was asking. Equities are one possibility but nobody needs telling that this approach is not guaranteed.......gilts...no....linker gilts...no.......
Sure there is a cost for this protection which means that the real value of the protected sum is lower than the current value of the pot used to purchase this protected forever sum but is that unexpected that you have to pay for protection?And yes, bonds do have fixed durations.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards