📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bonds v Shares best bet for 2022

Hi
I am looking to invest around 100K soon into a Vanguard LS account
I am not adverse to some risk but am interested in your views regarding markets going forward - i realise this is not a science.
Can't decide whether to go for a 60% shares option or 60% bonds option with Vanguard - im looking at a 3-5 yr period
Any views gratefully received
Thanks in advance
L
«13

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 27,537 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 30 September 2021 at 11:11AM
    The most obvious comment to make is that 5 years is the absolute minimum recommended for holding investments . > 10 years is better . Three years is too short unless you are happy to take a significant risk of loss .

    Regarding bonds and shares, both seem to be running at the higher  end of valuations.
    Most outlooks for equities over the next decade seem to point  to only modest real returns ( after inflation) maybe 2 or 3 % pa on average .
    Bonds are more complicated as there are different types, but the issue is that any significant rise in interest rates will adversely effect bond prices .
    Normally 40% equities 60% bonds would be the safer option, but could be that is reversed in the coming years . 
    So heads or tails I guess.
  • Go to the portfolio visualiser site, create your two portfolios (60/40 and 40/60). Choose a sensible equity and bond holding to roughly match what VLS has eg if VLS has global equities, then choose half the equities to be US and half to be global ex US as I don't think it offers a single choice of global. Have a look at the resultant graphs for what can happen over any 3-5 year period within the last few decades.  That should give you some idea of what might happen in the next few years.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 30 September 2021 at 11:19AM
    The higher the equity % the greater the volatility. The inherent danger with holding equities over the short term is that if the market dips.  You may not regain the lost capital within the timeframe that you wish to hold the investment. In your case 3-5 years.  Roll back to 2007 when global markets peaked. The GFC subsequently followed. Markets didn't recover pre GFC levels until 2013. 

    Picking up on your thread title. Never bet on markets. 
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,123 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    When designing a portfolio the primary driver should be what you want to achieve in what timeframe.  There is no point in planning on the basis of your or anyone else's predictions of future market behaviour - neither you nor they know what the furture will bring.

    In your case if your requirement really is to spend all the money in 3-5 years time anything other than keeping it in cash would be foolish IMHO.


  • What do you want the money for in 3-5 years? Because if you definitely do need it in 3-5 years investing is not appropriate and you could look at £50k in premium bonds and the rest (perhaps) in fixed-rate savings accounts.

    https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/savings-accounts-best-interest/
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,928 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Bonds v Shares best bet for 2022

    [...]

    im looking at a 3-5 yr period
    In which case, why the specific interest in what may or may not happen in 2022?

    I am looking to invest around 100K soon into a Vanguard LS account
    Taking a step back, what are your investment objectives, and on what basis do you feel that Vanguard LifeStrategy gives you the best chance of achieving them, versus their competitors and other solutions in the wider market?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,516 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
     im looking at a 3-5 yr period
    So very short term which means you should take minimal risk unless you are a high risk investor by nature.

    You should anticipate a 15-20% loss being possible, even probable if you invest for such a short period.



    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thanks all
    Thruglemir's suggestion about more volitility in shares over the short term makes sense - ie the ref. to 2007
    If so then 60% bonds may be the way - markets seem hard to predict at the moment. I've got a few 'informed' friends who suggest that USA stocks could well crash or lose significant value in the next year or so.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,928 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    markets seem hard to predict at the moment
    Are you under the impression that you actually need the last three words there? :)
  • what age you are now?
    If approaching 58, dump some in SIPP and get 20-25% extra from the government and then can start withdraw slowly.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.7K Life & Family
  • 256.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.