We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Insurance low balling on total loss for non fault claim

Options
13»

Comments

  • drsquirrel
    drsquirrel Posts: 283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 24 January at 5:59PM
    The problem is that people want silly money for used cars at the moment. It's going to be very hard to challenge. You could get your own expert, but it will cost you.

    This has been going on a while, though by that logic shouldn't mine be worth more as well?


  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January at 5:59PM
    The problem is that people want silly money for used cars at the moment. It's going to be very hard to challenge. You could get your own expert, but it will cost you.

    This has been going on a while, though by that logic shouldn't mine be worth more as well?


    What I mean is that people can ask silly money, but that doesn't mean people will pay it. The prices advertised are not the prices paid.

    It's most unsatisfactory, but there really isn't much you can do. Maybe look for another model or make, similar but cheaper due to being more common or something.
  • drsquirrel
    drsquirrel Posts: 283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The autobox makes it less common than anything else really.

    Part of my original question was if I just went ahead and purchased a car, I would have a real price. Then if I could claim this from teh other driver, specially if there was a shortfall in the difference offered by MY insurance company.
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 5,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The autobox makes it less common than anything else really.

    Part of my original question was if I just went ahead and purchased a car, I would have a real price. Then if I could claim this from teh other driver, specially if there was a shortfall in the difference offered by MY insurance company.
    Broadly, no. 

    The other driver's liability is to pay you the market value of your old car. This will not necessarily be the same as the actual price of any car you choose to replace it with. The car you buy as a replacement is unlikely to be an exact copy of the one that was written off. And even if it is, the price you pay for one particular car at one particular dealership is not necessarily the market value. You might have been lucky enough to get a very good deal, or you might have been fleeced by a dealer who saw you coming a mile off. Either way, the amount you can claim would be different to the amount you spent in a replacement.

    At best the price you paid for a similar model is some evidence of the market price - but probably not good enough evidence by itself to overturn the opinion of an expert or the trade guides.

    In theory if you can show that your insurer did pay less then the market value you could reclaim the difference from the at fault driver (or in practice from his own insurer, who will deal with any claim against him). However if you could prove that your insurer paid less then the market price, you would be able to get the full value out of your own insurer, via the Ombudsman.

    Making a claim against the driver (which in practice means dealing with his own insurer) at best gives you another bite of the cherry at arguing over what the fair market price is - it doesn't change the principles of how fair market price is calculated. And the problem with going through the courts is that (a) the FOS has a greater pro-consumer bias than the courts, so it is unlikely (not impossible) that you'll get a better result in court than you did from the FOS and (2) you will be liable for costs if you lose in court. Admittedly costs would not be huge in the small claims court - but they would not be zero either. 
  • Sandtree
    Sandtree Posts: 10,628 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January at 5:59PM
    The problem is that people want silly money for used cars at the moment. It's going to be very hard to challenge. You could get your own expert, but it will cost you.

    This has been going on a while, though by that logic shouldn't mine be worth more as well?


    No, its worth what it was immediately before the crash... the valuation doesn't continue to fluctuate after, in normal times if it did that'd mean insurers just sat on claims waiting for the vehicle to continue to depreciate. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.