We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Inherited Property
cj2804
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hello,
My husband and I are trying to buy a house.
2 years ago he inherited a sixth of a property (split between siblings - only worth around 120k between them all and some siblings are still living there), but is still not yet on the deeds. We were told that we would be able to keep first time buyer status if he wasn't named but now I have been told that because he had a beneficial interested named in the will.
My question is, do we lose first time buyer status, and if so, would it be better to try get him taken off and trust the siblings later would gift him back the funds?
Thanks in advance!
My husband and I are trying to buy a house.
2 years ago he inherited a sixth of a property (split between siblings - only worth around 120k between them all and some siblings are still living there), but is still not yet on the deeds. We were told that we would be able to keep first time buyer status if he wasn't named but now I have been told that because he had a beneficial interested named in the will.
My question is, do we lose first time buyer status, and if so, would it be better to try get him taken off and trust the siblings later would gift him back the funds?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
Why has this not been sorted.
Some of the family are living in the house !
They should have got a mortgage and paid your husband his 1/6 share £20,000 which you could have saved into a LISA and had £4,000+ government bonus.
Who is responsible for sorting the Will ?1 -
Didn't come here for judgement thank you.
Executors are family members and when probate started we were not looking for a property. Obviously that would have been ideal, but the siblings still living there are not in a position financially to get a mortgage and the house has been mortgage free for 4 years. So please do not judge and say why has it not been sorted when you don't know all the facts.
0 -
He cannot be a 1/6th owner. Only four named individuals can be joint owners. "Name on the deeds" IS ownership.
The actual owner might be a trust (of which he's a 1/6th beneficiary) or a limited company (of which he's a 1/6th shareholder), but I suspect that it's still the estate of the deceased... or (most likely) is in the name of the current occupants... The executor of the estate (who?) has failed in their job. A few quid to download the title from Land Registry's website will answer that one.
It's not "judgement" to say that this should have been sorted in the last two years, nor are the "facts" particularly relevant. It's simply a fact of life that it should have been sorted by now, one way or another.
Right now, your husband has not got a penny of his £20k inheritance, and has not even been receiving a penny in rent from the property or interest on the £20k private mortgage he's effectively lent them. He might as well have been left nothing... All he has is a verbal IOU that's not worth the paper it's written on, and becomes less valuable as time passes and memories fade.
If he were an actual or beneficial owner, then his FTB status has gone forever. He has previously owned a property. Like virginity, FTB status cannot be regained. Some "FTB" benefits from lenders etc may be available to non-FTBs who have had a very small stake in a property or have been non-owners for a certain period of time.
At least a £20k share is small enough that it won't cause additional property +3% SDLT to be payable.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
