We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Ofgem orders Avro Energy to provide financial information
Comments
-
From Ofgem - data supplied on 1 April 2021Verdigris said:Avro have about 2% market share, same as Utility Warehouse. More like 400,000 customers.
GAS: Fixed rate customers 466,821
Default rate 86,544 Total GAS: 553,365
ELEC: Fixed rate 464,372
Default rate 89,463 Total ELEC: 553,835
I did not realise they were considered a "medium size" supplier - i thought they were a much smaller player.0 -
Suppliers bid top become a SoLR, because they want the extra customers.QrizB said:greenguppie said:
How do you know that? That a claim will be lodged for every penny that is spent?Dolor said:Ofgem can require any supplier to act as a SoLR. We can all take comfort from the fact that a claim will be lodged against Ofgem for every penny that is spent by the appointed SoLR in meeting this legal obligation.
For someone like BG with their 10 million existing customers, I suspect BG could swallow 40,000 additional customers with hardly a ripple to their current overall energy provison projections.There's a legal obligation on directors of companies to maximise shareholder value. The idea that a director would instruct their business "no, don't claim those millions from Ofgem's fund, we've got plenty of money" is absurd.Not least as that director would find themselves being repriamanded by their own shareholders, who set the director's remuneration.
But if they go in with a bid based on we will claim every penny we possibly can, they are not going to win a competitive bid are they?
If the directors fail to grow the company because they were not prepared to spend a little money to secure more customers, don't you think those same shareholders will be even more upset?
D'oh!
0 -
Agreed. Where a SoLR is 'army volunteered', then sure why not claim as much as they can.MWT said:greenguppie said:
How do you know that? That a claim will be lodged for every penny that is spent?
For someone like BG with their 10 million existing customers, I suspect BG could swallow 40,000 additional customers with hardly a ripple to their current overall energy provison projections.I think that was said in the context of a forced appointment of a SoLR.When the energy companies are bidding against each other for the spoils they tend to offer to absorb the costs, but if they have had a problem they didn't want, dumped on them, then there is little reason not to claim everything they can...
So far, Ofgem has always managed to receive acceptable bids to be appointed a SoLR.
Wouldn't expect anything else really in a competitive market involving 60'ish suppliers
(not suggesting all would be able to submit an acceptable bid, even if they wnated to)
But the large suppliers have lost hundreds of thousands of customers to these smaller suppliers over the years. Now they have a chance to snatch some of them back into their fold
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards