We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Distribution of estate between siblings

fuzzything
fuzzything Posts: 124 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
edited 15 September 2021 at 12:17AM in Deaths, funerals & probate
My sister and I are ready to distribute our mothers estate, which was left in her will equally shared between us. It consists of a property and money, which comes to more than the value of the property.

My sister and I would like her to receive the whole of the property by transfer from the estate along with her receiving the additional money required to give her half the total value of the estate, and for me to receive my half of the estate only as money.

We had a RICS property valuation for probate as at the date of death 9 January 2021, and used that on inheritance tax form. The amount has been accepted by HMRC, and we our now at the point of being able to distribute the estate. 

Can my sister and I decide between us that the value of the property has gone up by say 3% since January and take that into account when sharing out the money between us. Would there be Capital Gains tax or stamp duty due? I would have thought not as no one is buying or selling.

I already own a property, but my sister does not.


Comments

  • If you are both in agreement then yes you can split the assets as you wish. There will be no SD or CGT, although if she is not planning to live in the house HMRC would expect any CG on a future sale to be based on the probate value not what are are considering as the current value.

    To be fair to your sister you should take into account the savings you are making in avoiding selling costs for the house as well as any increase in value.

  • To be fair to your sister you should take into account the savings you are making in avoiding selling costs for the house as well as any increase in value.
    Given that they are not even considering selling it, then they're not 'saving' anything.

    If anything, the sister will be saving the buying fees if she were buying any other house so I don't think it's the OP who needs to be 'fair' to their sister in this situation.  
  • doodling
    doodling Posts: 1,351 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi,

    The fairness is inherent in the distribution of the estate. There won't be any selling fees so the estate is bigger overall and both beneficiaries receive more.

    No further adjustment needed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.