We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PCN appeal rejected. Liable to £100 fine.

Hi,

The parking space that is allocated to the flat I rent is managed by a company called Parking and Property Management Ltd. This scheme was in force before I moved to this flat and they have issued me 2 PCNs since I've been living here.

They rejected the appeal for my first PCN and then I just gave in and paid the £60. I then stuck my permit to my dashboard with blue tack.

The second PCN got issued because I forgot to attach my PCN back onto my dashboard after getting my car cleaned. It's a paper permit so I didn't want it to get ruined whilst the car was being cleaned. 

This time they didn't attach a ticket to my car but looked up my license plate number and sent a PCN letter to my address. That address is my parents' address so I was late in receiving the letter. So late, that the 2 week reduced fine period had passed and I was subject to paying £100 instead of £60.

I appealed this PCN too, mentioning primacy of contract (there is no mention of requiring a permit to park in my space) and how I did not get an opportunity to opt-out as the scheme was already in force before I moved here. They've rejected this appeal saying the following:

 Having viewed the photographic evidence, your vehicle can be seen close to a sign stating the parking reg-ulations. Signage clearly states that parking is permitted for vehicles fully displaying a valid permit within the front windscreen and parked fully within the confines of a marked bay. 

The parking charge was clearly advertised and you were in possession of all the information needed to make a decision. You chose to park. In our view, this act, by the appellant, constituted acceptance of the offer to pay the charge and formed a binding contract between the parties. It would follow that there was no inherent unfairness in the way this agreement was reached. 

Unfortunately, the operatives hand held device would not connect to wifi and therefore, a PCN could not be printed out and stuck to the windscreen. Hence the requirement to send a postal PCN. 

PPM are satisfied you are in possession of a permit and are aware of the parking restrictions. We refer you to PCN XXXXXX which you appealed stating that your permit slipped from the dashboard. 

PPM’s letter dated XX.XX.XXXX draws your attention to this being an OPT OUT site. The letter states: Should you wish to remove your bay from the scheme, please contact info@pandpmanagement.co.uk. Please be aware that should you choose to opt out of the parking scheme, PPM will NOT monitor your bay and ANY vehicle will be able to park there. 

PPM’s records show that you have chosen not to opt out of the parking scheme. Therefore, you have accepted the terms of the contract. 

The address is a leasehold property, which effectively means that although the leaseholder has a right to use both the property and any accompanying parking space, they must also adhere to the freeholder’s terms of use, which in this case have been set out in the contractual signage located throughout the site and in clear view of the vehicle. The signage in the area makes it clear that the restrictions apply to all vehicles parked at this site and that if vehicles park otherwise than in accordance with the terms a charge will be payable. 

The reasons you have put forward for parking in a clearly regulated parking area do not justify parking otherwise than in accordance with the restrictions. You will appreciate that everyone has what they re-gard as reasonable grounds for parking. The location is private land and as such there is a need to ensure that only vehicles conforming to the advertised restrictions can park on site. 

I have a feeling that even if I took this case to court, I'd lose because they've used my first PCN appeal letter to reiterate that I had the opportunity to opt-out and I didn't.

What are you thoughts? And do you think I should appeal any further or just pay the £100? If I opt-out now, I still lose because I will have paid £160 all for a space that will no longer be protected. The car park is off-road and there are signs stating it's a private car park so not sure if opting out will even make a difference to me.

Thanks a lot.

Comments

  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 13 September 2021 at 5:17PM
    We think you wouldn’t lose in court (99% of posters here WIN or see the useless claim discontinued when properly defended).

    You should sit tight and prepare to defend it at a proper court.  Unless you want the laugh of trying the kangaroo court of IAS and losing there first. 

    No paying.

    I would also opt out immediately.  Your space is not being ‘protected’ by anyone.


    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • We think you wouldn’t lose in court (99% of posters here WIN or see the useless claim discontinued when properly defended).

    You should sit tight and prepare to defend it at a proper court.  Unless you want the laugh of trying the kangaroo court of IAS and losing there first. 

    No paying.

    I would also opt out immediately.  Your space is not being ‘protected’ by anyone.



    You're right, I won't be wasting my time with IAS. The prospect of defending my case in court is daunting and it's frustrating having to wait for a court date many months later. I don't know where I will be at that time but I certainly don't want to pay £100.

    It would've been less unreasonable for them to reduce the charge to £60 or charge half as much for residents but it's clear they aren't there to protect residents.

    I will opt out of having my space managed by them. It's just confusing that so many residents continue to have their parking space managed by these thieves.
  • Thanks @D_P_Dance  I'll spend some more time going through the Newbies threads to build a defense when it comes to it.

    Good idea - will also complain to my MP.

    Do you know what's ridiculous? I wouldn't have got fined had I parked my car on the street outside the car park.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.