We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Water damage to flat below...who pays for damage?
Comments
-
How is the buildings insurance arranged/paid for and who does it?
I have a freehold flat in Scotland and our buildings insurance is one policy for all the flats. When this happened to me (leak from flat above) it was the buildings insurance that paid for it.0 -
GaleSF63 said:How is the buildings insurance arranged/paid for and who does it?
I have a freehold flat in Scotland and our buildings insurance is one policy for all the flats. When this happened to me (leak from flat above) it was the buildings insurance that paid for it.0 -
gscott34 said:GaleSF63 said:How is the buildings insurance arranged/paid for and who does it?
I have a freehold flat in Scotland and our buildings insurance is one policy for all the flats. When this happened to me (leak from flat above) it was the buildings insurance that paid for it.
Is each flat is responsible for its own buildings insurance?
0 -
Seems an odd arrangement. What if the building burns down and one or more of the owners doesn't have insurance to cover their part of the re-build cost?
If yours is the 2nd floor and the ground and 1st floor don't have insurance you are a bit stuffed?Sorry I can't think of anything profound, clever or witty to write here.0 -
I lived in a tenement in Scotland and had my own insurance. Part of the ceiling above the stairs came down and another owner contacted their insurance. The insurance company contacted all the other flats and the cost was split between them.Lost my soulmate so life is empty.
I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
Diana Gabaldon, Outlander0 -
NSG666 said:Seems an odd arrangement. What if the building burns down and one or more of the owners doesn't have insurance to cover their part of the re-build cost?
If yours is the 2nd floor and the ground and 1st floor don't have insurance you are a bit stuffed?
I am sure it could be worked out - rather than rebuilding, perhaps the insured person gets the sale price of the home (like a car write off) and the insurance company becomes part owner with the uninsured people of a development plot.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll1 -
There must be precedent for this. How otherwise could you get a mortgage for a shared freehold property in Scotland, unless there was adequate buildings insurance in place? No one would lend without such cover in place.No free lunch, and no free laptop1
-
I was flooded from ff flat and had to claim on my own insurance.1
-
macman said:There must be precedent for this. How otherwise could you get a mortgage for a shared freehold property in Scotland, unless there was adequate buildings insurance in place? No one would lend without such cover in place.
We're kind of taking the OP's word for it that they didn't know about the leak AND that they're somehow not insured to cover the resulting damage. It's the OP's responsibility that their plumbing caused damage to the flat downstairs. It's a bit cheeky of the OP now saying that the people downstairs have to claim for the damage that wasn't caused by them and couldn't have been prevented by them.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards