We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help with defence
Comments
-
... saying a lot of what i have done is copy and paste are asking the judge to throw it out
If you think that the solicitor has acted unprofessionally, and it certainly sounds like it, complain to the SRA here,
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems/report-solicitor/
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
They always try that - it is a futile exercise for them as one judge commented when a claimant made that remark in a court hearing "so what!" Not to mention that nearly every defendant gets a letter like that, so now who is copying and pasting?Ktm1050 said:Got everything done and have my court telephone hearing in march ..got the other sides paper work and they are saying a lot of what i have done is copy and paste are asking the judge to throw it out before trial even tho i have pictures of no signage where i was parked ..what are the chances that she ..its a lady judge will do that ..the other side has said he will not be there and is passing it down to a junior rep and wants costs for his time ..whats the worst it could end up paying if i lose .. im getting nervous as it draws closer..
1 -
OP reports a WIN on another thread: -Ktm1050 said:Had my day in court via phone call ..judge looked at what the other side had presented and struck it out on them sending me their evidence at the last minute also they had not made any effort to show why they was claiming against me .all over in 5 mins . I had done all my photos and reason's for no signage . the other side only sent a rep and not a solicitor so she was not impressed thanks for all the help and advice
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6341171/victory-today/p1
1 -
That response is pathetic and rude - who sent that (a solicitor?).Ktm1050 said:Got everything done and have my court telephone hearing in march ..got the othe sides paper work and they are saying a lot of what i have done is copy and paste are asking the judge to throw it out before trial even tho i have pictures of no signage where i was parked ..what are the chances that she ..its a lady judge will do that ..the other side has said he will not be there and is passing it down to a junior rep and wants costs for his time ..whats the worst it could end up paying if i lose .. im getting nervous as it draws closer..
You are allowed to research online and use a template to help you create a defence. Don't let that get to you!
Have you seen the news last month, that things have changed for the better recently?
Read the whole new DLUHC Code of Practice because it covers all the usual points and issues, and states the best practice position.
Not retrospective but you can use it to effectively say 'Here's what a professional parking firm should have done'.
I've created a new paragraph 4 onwards to replace the template defence, which covers the fact that debt recover pseudo 'costs' are now banned:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/79031299/#Comment_79031299
You will also notice that para 4 and 5 covers what to say about them accusing you of copying your defence. I realise you are way past defence stage but it's not too late to make yourself crib sheet bullet point notes for the hearing.
That new wording explains to a Judge why that is relevant for existing cases, too.
We are encouraging everyone with a claim that includes the 'extortionate' fake costs to deal with that more robustly than ever.
In case you missed it, we are talking about the very welcome statutory Code of Practice produced by the DLUHC on 7th February, the development for which included my personal involvement and attendance in the Government's Steering Group since 2020, which I was not able to admit until afterwards.
Fully discussed in bargepole's thread here, so newbies can understand this ground-breaking news and the changes:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6333036/breaking-news-government-has-announced-the-statutory-code-of-practice-and-enforcement-framework/p1
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Wait - I see you won already, well done!
I will leave the above reply as it may help others looking for hearing tips.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

