Council Tax Valuations - the true story

3 Posts

I'd like to correct some of Martin's comments about the valuations carried out for Council Tax puposes. I was one of the valuers involved in preparing these assessments in 1992, following the Local Government Finance Act of that year. Council Tax did not come into effect until 1st April 1993, but the valuations we carried out in 1992 were based on values as at April 1991.
In my experience most of the valuers were, like me, chartered surveyors who were carrying out work such as residential valuations on a daily basis. I agree that some estate agents were also involved but I am pretty sure that they weren't in the majority. And far from there being no 'detailed information' available we were in fact provided with the District Valuers' complete records of every house which included the accommodation, heating, extensions etc which the District Valuers had collected for the previous rating system. The whole exercise was very well organised by the local District Valuers' offices, and there were regular random quality assessments of our work, both by the District Valuers and other valuers. (The District Valuers barely exist now, and are called the Valuation Office)
Of course the valuations were only carried out on a 'drive-by' basis. How else does Martin suggest they could've been done? It would've been impossible to find enough valuers to visit and inspect every house in the land. And don't forget that we were putting the houses into 'bands' of value, we were not doing assessments for selling purposes or anything like that.They were not 'poor'' valuations - the vast majority were accurate, but in an exercise as big as this one there are always bound to be some mistakes and I applaud you for encouraging people to get them rectified. But please don't use this to denigrate the valuers who did the work, and please also correct your statement that 'every word' of your story 'is true'. Thanks.
In my experience most of the valuers were, like me, chartered surveyors who were carrying out work such as residential valuations on a daily basis. I agree that some estate agents were also involved but I am pretty sure that they weren't in the majority. And far from there being no 'detailed information' available we were in fact provided with the District Valuers' complete records of every house which included the accommodation, heating, extensions etc which the District Valuers had collected for the previous rating system. The whole exercise was very well organised by the local District Valuers' offices, and there were regular random quality assessments of our work, both by the District Valuers and other valuers. (The District Valuers barely exist now, and are called the Valuation Office)
Of course the valuations were only carried out on a 'drive-by' basis. How else does Martin suggest they could've been done? It would've been impossible to find enough valuers to visit and inspect every house in the land. And don't forget that we were putting the houses into 'bands' of value, we were not doing assessments for selling purposes or anything like that.They were not 'poor'' valuations - the vast majority were accurate, but in an exercise as big as this one there are always bound to be some mistakes and I applaud you for encouraging people to get them rectified. But please don't use this to denigrate the valuers who did the work, and please also correct your statement that 'every word' of your story 'is true'. Thanks.
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/site/site-contacts/
I am sure that you did your best and were very professional, but it hardly sounds like an accurate process.