We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Help please! Car buyer threatening legal action

124

Comments

  • DB1904
    DB1904 Posts: 1,240 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 21 October 2024 at 12:02PM
    So he would essentially be trying to bring a claim on the basis that the car is unroadworthy but then wouldn’t the judge ask if such is the case, why did he buy the car if at the time of purchase HE knew it would be so. His friend even pointed out to him that a missing bolt is an MOT fail. 
    You knew it was unroadworthy when you sold it and in doing so committed a criminal offence.
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 6,106 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 October 2024 at 12:02PM
    DB1904 said:
    So he would essentially be trying to bring a claim on the basis that the car is unroadworthy but then wouldn’t the judge ask if such is the case, why did he buy the car if at the time of purchase HE knew it would be so. His friend even pointed out to him that a missing bolt is an MOT fail. 
    You knew it was unroadworthy when you sold it and in doing so committed a criminal offence.
    Absolute nonsense.

    The dangers of posting for advice on a forum open to all clearly exposed.
    It's technically correct to say that it's an offence to sell an unroadworthy car - unless you have good reason to believe that the buyer is not going to drive it before he has made it roadworthy.

    It's also the case that the buyer committed an offence of his own by driving away the car after he bought it.

    Neither fact has any obvious relevance to the question of whether the the buyer is entitled to a refund. 
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 8,399 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    DB1904 said:
    So he would essentially be trying to bring a claim on the basis that the car is unroadworthy but then wouldn’t the judge ask if such is the case, why did he buy the car if at the time of purchase HE knew it would be so. His friend even pointed out to him that a missing bolt is an MOT fail. 
    You knew it was unroadworthy when you sold it and in doing so committed a criminal offence.
    Absolute nonsense.

    Road Traffic Act 1988, Section 75.  Paragraph (1) makes it on offence to sell an unroadworthy vehicle.  Paragraph (6) provides a defence if "he had reasonable cause to believe that the vehicle or trailer would not be used on a road in Great Britain, or would not be so used until it had been put into a condition in which it might lawfully be so used".


    So selling an unroadworthy vehicle, in the expectation that the buyer will drive it away, is a criminal offence.

    The dangers of posting for advice on a forum open to all clearly exposed.

    Very true.


    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 19 July 2021 at 12:01PM
    Whether or not the OP has committed a criminal offence is not really the point here. It's a civil dispute. What the vendor is demanding is £750 for faults which were clearly present at the time he inspected and test drove it. And some of which (the wheel bolt issue) were voluntarily disclosed by the OP, even though he was under no obligation to do so.
    The vendor has no case for a refund and the OP can safely ignore any demands made. 
    That said, it's never a good idea to describe any vehicle as 'drives fine' in an advert, as it's just too open-ended and subject to interpretation.

    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • caprikid1
    caprikid1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    " I listed it as drives well with no faults. "

    The only real requirements in a private sale is the car must be as described and no unroadworthy unless the buyer is clearly aware.

    Why anyone would describe a 15 year old range rover as "No faults" I have no idea. He is clearly a chance but you have not made life easy with this statement. Still tell him to do one though.

  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 October 2024 at 12:02PM
    DB1904 said:
    So he would essentially be trying to bring a claim on the basis that the car is unroadworthy but then wouldn’t the judge ask if such is the case, why did he buy the car if at the time of purchase HE knew it would be so. His friend even pointed out to him that a missing bolt is an MOT fail. 
    You knew it was unroadworthy when you sold it and in doing so committed a criminal offence.
    Why are you continuing to bang this drum?

    Is that the point in hand?

    Are you proposing asking the O/P for their full name and address and reporting them to the police?

    Or should they go now and hand themselves in?


  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 July 2021 at 9:04PM
    caprikid1 said:
    " I listed it as drives well with no faults. "

    The only real requirements in a private sale is the car must be as described and no unroadworthy unless the buyer is clearly aware.

    Why anyone would describe a 15 year old range rover as "No faults" I have no idea. He is clearly a chance but you have not made life easy with this statement. Still tell him to do one though.

    I definitely wouldnt have advertised it as "no faults" either and like you i'd be firmly telling him to do one.


  • I think from whats described above the wheel bolts were still holding the wheel but the heads were missing or damaged (maybe locking wheelnuts that had been chewed up to get them on/off previously without the key.

    As mentioned many times tell him to "jog on" if he does come back with court proceedings you need to take them seriously be he almost certainly won't.  Most people who do this are just chancing their arm, lets be honest who buys a 15 year old prestige car for peanuts and expects it to be perfect, idiots. thats who!  If I bought something like that I would expect there to be issues and would allow money in my budget to put them right.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.