We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Falsely accused of fly tipping
Comments
-
delete 1230
-
No, it isn't.[DELETED USER] said:It's one of those nasty situations where the law makes you guilty until proven innocent
The OP has received an FPN. That's an alternative to going through the justice system, whereby they get a very lenient penalty in return for accepting they did indeed do it.
If they did not do it, they get their day in court. That court hearing uses the normal criminal justice balance of proof - innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
The council have evidence that the OP's name and address was in the tipped rubbish.
No, that is not proof beyond reasonable doubt that the OP tipped it.
1 -
If nothing else because they're not the only person in the household - given it's their sister's house, why is not just as (if not more) plausible that she dumped the rubbish?AdrianC said:
No, that is not proof beyond reasonable doubt that the OP tipped it.[DELETED USER] said:It's one of those nasty situations where the law makes you guilty until proven innocent0 -
[DELETED USER] said:
Yes, that's exactly how it is. It's ridiculous but the courts are very much inclined to just believe the police unless there is strong evidence that they are wrong.dombratt said:
That's what I just don't get, if I received your letter for example and I live on the same road, i can just fly tip your letter and boom £400 FPN and there is little to nothing you can do about it, assuming you don't personally handle all of your waste and keep note of every single letter you have?[DELETED USER] said:It's one of those nasty situations where the law makes you guilty until proven innocent and it's almost impossible to prove you are innocent.
The burden of proof is supposed to be "beyond reasonable doubt" but in practice the courts often just assume that something with your name on it means you must have done it, even though there a hundred ways it could have got there with no involvement from you.
If you do reject it and go to court you will get to see what evidence they have. You might find there is something you can use, such as an incorrectly addressed letter or a sealed envelope with a bank statement that you would clearly have wanted and not dumped. The problem is they will only submit the minimum evidence they need to so you probably won't get a complete picture of what happened. You could try questioning the person who found it but that isn't easy.
Legal advice would help but probably cost you £100 and then advise you to pay the fine anyway. If you aren't too worried about the conviction and costs then you could proceed to court anyway.
Welcome to the English "justice" system.
You can fight it but it will cost you, and even if you win you will have lost a lot of money and years of worry (it takes forever to go through the system and there is a massive COVID backlog).
This is what you get after a decade of Tory austerity.Courts are inclined to believe the police, not that the police are even involved here... It's council and a civil enforcement.I suspect more people get away with a crime because there is that slim chance it wasn't them then get convicted when innocent.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
