We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is solicitor correct? Confused
Jackdaw75
Posts: 12 Forumite
When i bought wifes ex out of their house we made arrangement (her and I) as tennants in common as 65% hers and 35% me.
Now porting mortgage and topping up to buy new house.
Chose tenants in common again same split, but solicitor is saying this can't be done unless we contribute to the mortgage and bills in same manner. We can only claim deposit in that way:
This is only appropriate where you intend to contribute to all outgoings, including the mortgage, in these proportions also. If you are contributing to the deposit in these proportions but the outgoings equally, then I would recommend a Trust deed which protects the additional lump sum invested by wife at the outset, but divides all surplus equity equally
I earn substantially more than my wife's salary so in event of a split i could get another mortgage easily but she would need most of house sale proceeds to even be lucky to get a tiny home.
So, why can't we have the split like this not just for the deposit but the total ownership?
Thanks if you can explain it to me.
Now porting mortgage and topping up to buy new house.
Chose tenants in common again same split, but solicitor is saying this can't be done unless we contribute to the mortgage and bills in same manner. We can only claim deposit in that way:
This is only appropriate where you intend to contribute to all outgoings, including the mortgage, in these proportions also. If you are contributing to the deposit in these proportions but the outgoings equally, then I would recommend a Trust deed which protects the additional lump sum invested by wife at the outset, but divides all surplus equity equally
I earn substantially more than my wife's salary so in event of a split i could get another mortgage easily but she would need most of house sale proceeds to even be lucky to get a tiny home.
So, why can't we have the split like this not just for the deposit but the total ownership?
Thanks if you can explain it to me.
0
Comments
-
It is a recommendation not a rule. ( A recommendation which will cost you money in the form of a trust deed).There is no legal reason you cannot continue with a 65% 35% split so long as you are happy to own in those proportions going forward. In the event of divorce all assets are in the melting pot anyway (unless it is a very short time of marriage) so the percentage split would be irrelevant.1
-
Comments:
- It looks like a comment rather than an insistence at this stage?
- If the solicitor is acting for both of you then they may be unwilling to agree a split which they see as unfair without the party coming off worse having their own legal representation. They can't act for both of you at once if you have differing interests.
- There is nothing stopping you ignoring the contents of the deed with respect to mortgage contribution and bills.
- How long have you been married? The trust deed might already be irrelevant if its been a long time.
1 -
Thanks for replies.
Together 5 years, married 1 year.
Current house is her previous marital home, she had a very messy divorce had to pay ex a lot despite her being main carer to their kids and she paid mortgage and bills fully when he moved out.
New house we wish to purchase she couldn't afford by herself if worst happened, so she is understandably concerned and wants to protect hers and her kids interests after being bitten before.
So I could request solicitor follows our wishes?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards