We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Student finance

2»

Comments

  • kaMelo
    kaMelo Posts: 2,893 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    andrewmp said:
    I agree that it is unfair that it is classed as income when you owe it back

    Did you know you can get extra money for parent's living allowance.  That might help your situation a bit.  I think they also disregard some of your student loan income.
    How is it unfair?
    Whether you're currently working or receiving benefits it treats everyone equally by providing money as a replacement for what income you will lose due to studying. To ignore the money available from a student loan for benefit recipients would place them in a better position than non benefit recipients, essentially double dipping the public purse..

    More importantly a student loan is not really a debt as such, it's only repayable at 9% on any earnings above the threshold for a maximum or thirty years whatever your level of borrowing is.. A graduate tax is a more appropriate description than a loan.
  • Lanzarote1938
    Lanzarote1938 Posts: 694 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts PPI Party Pooper
    Benefit rules evolve and change. For instance not many years ago mortgage interest was paid without penalty. now it is added as a charge on the property to be repaid when property sells. Who knows it is not inconceivable that nebefit payments could be treated like student loans and have to be repaid if/when the recipient earns a certain amount.
  • Pok3mon
    Pok3mon Posts: 163 Forumite
    100 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary
    Benefit rules evolve and change. For instance not many years ago mortgage interest was paid without penalty. now it is added as a charge on the property to be repaid when property sells. Who knows it is not inconceivable that nebefit payments could be treated like student loans and have to be repaid if/when the recipient earns a certain amount.
    I do hope so, I know some body who paid off their house when interest rates was about 3% and below but SMI was paid at 6.5% flat rate over 12 years got a free house!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.