We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sale fallen through for second time close to exchange
Comments
-
They offered a deed of variation to include:GDB2222 said:
Lots of estate service charges are indeed rentcharges these days. You may struggle to sell, as buyers and their lenders have become more aware of the problem.tink_1983 said:
Its a service charge for the estate. The buyers solicitors said it read as a rent charge which was the issue. They offered to reword it slightly but it was not to her satisfactionGDB2222 said:Is this a rentcharge that you are talking about?
What alteration did the builders offer?
"Please note that as per the attached requirements of your lender, we intend to insert mortgagee protection provisions of at least 2 months so that in the event of any powers being exercised under S121 Law of Property Act?1925, the mortgagee is provided 2 months? notice to remedy any of these and allow them the scope and time to step in and sort the matter out, and then to take up the matter directly with the mortgagor.? We would also provide such scope for the rentcharge powers under S121(4)?to be sufficiently diluted in that upon full payment of any arrears of the rent charge, reasonable costs of collecting arrears, all reasonable legal costs incurred including court costs of creating and surrendering the lease, then any lease granted under the powers of S121(4)?shall be surrendered immediately without premium. '
We do not propose to offer any sort of agreement or warranty that any service charges payable under the transfer do not constitute a rentcharge.? In our experience in such matters, the above provisions are satisfactory1 -
You don't happen to have the wording do you that the lenders would accept?Flugelhorn said:we bought a freehold house with a service charge on it, deed of variation was done and was tested against various mortgage providers requirements in case we wanted to sell
We are getting offers in but wondering if I should seek a variation on the Deed before the issues raises its head again.0 -
tink_1983 said:
They offered a deed of variation to include:GDB2222 said:
Lots of estate service charges are indeed rentcharges these days. You may struggle to sell, as buyers and their lenders have become more aware of the problem.tink_1983 said:
Its a service charge for the estate. The buyers solicitors said it read as a rent charge which was the issue. They offered to reword it slightly but it was not to her satisfactionGDB2222 said:Is this a rentcharge that you are talking about?
What alteration did the builders offer?
"Please note that as per the attached requirements of your lender, we intend to insert mortgagee protection provisions of at least 2 months so that in the event of any powers being exercised under S121 Law of Property Act?1925, the mortgagee is provided 2 months? notice to remedy any of these and allow them the scope and time to step in and sort the matter out, and then to take up the matter directly with the mortgagor.? We would also provide such scope for the rentcharge powers under S121(4)?to be sufficiently diluted in that upon full payment of any arrears of the rent charge, reasonable costs of collecting arrears, all reasonable legal costs incurred including court costs of creating and surrendering the lease, then any lease granted under the powers of S121(4)?shall be surrendered immediately without premium. '
We do not propose to offer any sort of agreement or warranty that any service charges payable under the transfer do not constitute a rentcharge.? In our experience in such matters, the above provisions are satisfactoryThat seems reasonable to me, and I would hope that it satisfies most lenders. It would be better if the developer would give two months notice to the lenders before exercising their powers. Perhaps they will agree to that.
Otherwise, I suggest that you pay for whatever deed of variation they are prepared to offer, bearing in mind that you have no real leverage.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1 -
I suggest that you have a rummage round the internet. This, for example:
https://www.talbotwalker.co.uk/advice/developers-beware-of-the-rentcharge/
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
ThankyouGDB2222 said:tink_1983 said:
They offered a deed of variation to include:GDB2222 said:
Lots of estate service charges are indeed rentcharges these days. You may struggle to sell, as buyers and their lenders have become more aware of the problem.tink_1983 said:
Its a service charge for the estate. The buyers solicitors said it read as a rent charge which was the issue. They offered to reword it slightly but it was not to her satisfactionGDB2222 said:Is this a rentcharge that you are talking about?
What alteration did the builders offer?
"Please note that as per the attached requirements of your lender, we intend to insert mortgagee protection provisions of at least 2 months so that in the event of any powers being exercised under S121 Law of Property Act?1925, the mortgagee is provided 2 months? notice to remedy any of these and allow them the scope and time to step in and sort the matter out, and then to take up the matter directly with the mortgagor.? We would also provide such scope for the rentcharge powers under S121(4)?to be sufficiently diluted in that upon full payment of any arrears of the rent charge, reasonable costs of collecting arrears, all reasonable legal costs incurred including court costs of creating and surrendering the lease, then any lease granted under the powers of S121(4)?shall be surrendered immediately without premium. '
We do not propose to offer any sort of agreement or warranty that any service charges payable under the transfer do not constitute a rentcharge.? In our experience in such matters, the above provisions are satisfactoryThat seems reasonable to me, and I would hope that it satisfies most lenders. It would be better if the developer would give two months notice to the lenders before exercising their powers. Perhaps they will agree to that.
Otherwise, I suggest that you pay for whatever deed of variation they are prepared to offer, bearing in mind that you have no real leverage.
This is my next query to my solicitor. If we should get the variation done ASAP for the potential future buyers.
Appreciate your response and I'll be digging online for more info also1 -
@tink_1983 I've come across similar situations faced by my clients where the remedy has been a different lender who is ok with the rent charge and/or deed of variation.
The problem you have is that this is the buyer's issue to solve and the best you can do is to be upfront with the specifics when you accept an offer so that the buyer or their broker has all the pertinent information to hand before they place the case with a lender.
More commonly what happens is that the vendor is aware but doesn't disclose any of this until it comes up late in the conveyancing process, leading to the situation you've experienced.I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
0 -
@K_S You make it sound like you think that it is only possible for the buyer to solve this problem? Why can’t the sellers see to it first?After all, if there were a hole in the roof, the sellers would probably fix that. This is effectively a hole in the title.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
We where happy to pay for the variation but our vendors solicitor was not happy with what the builders where willing to offer. The buyers solicitors wanted the term rentcharge changed to service charge which the builders didn't agree too.K_S said:@tink_1983 I've come across similar situations faced by my clients where the remedy has been a different lender who is ok with the rent charge and/or deed of variation.
The problem you have is that this is the buyer's issue to solve and the best you can do is to be upfront with the specifics when you accept an offer so that the buyer or their broker has all the pertinent information to hand before they place the case with a lender.
More commonly what happens is that the vendor is aware but doesn't disclose any of this until it comes up late in the conveyancing process, leading to the situation you've experienced.
I will ensure any new buyer knows of this issue upfront and discuss getting the variation done bur to include that the lenders will be informed of arrears too.
All been a massive learning curve. Purchased this house alone off plot and guess didn't understand the rentcharge implications at the time
Thanks again1 -
I will be proactively sorting this out so we don't have this issue again.GDB2222 said:@K_S You make it sound like you think that it is only possible for the buyer to solve this problem? Why can’t the sellers see to it first?After all, if there were a hole in the roof, the sellers would probably fix that. This is effectively a hole in the title.
Ironically my neighbours just sold and the new owners didn't have this come up as an issue at all?! Think I've been unlucky but also naive as didn't really understand the implications of the rent charge on the house I own1 -
If next door sold, with the same conditions, then why not down load their deeds and see what wording was used? cost approx £3 Land Registry
Breast Cancer Now 100 miles October 2022 100 / 100miles
D- Day 80km June 2024 80/80km (10.06.24 all done)
Diabetic UK 1 million steps July 2024 to complete by end Sept 2024. 1,001,066/ 1,000,000 (20.09.24 all done)
Breast Cancer Now 100 miles 1st May 2025 (18.05.2025 all done)
Diabetic UK 1 million steps July 2025 to complete by end Sept 2025. 1,006,489 / 1,000,000 (10.09.25 all done)
Breast Cancer Now 100 miles 1st October 2025 82/100Sun, Sea1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


