We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House has tenants in-situ who need to be rehoused by the council. Avoid?
Comments
-
What a weird situation to visit the house in. Poor old fella. I would have been so upset by that scene I wouldn't want to buy the house.0
-
This was completely irresponsible of the EA to carry out a viewing fin that setting
Though I appreciate the need to view, you could have walked in on the nurse assisting with a bed pan or anything. Very unfair on the current tenant who is probably already struggling.
The council may try and assist them sooner due to medical and welfare grounds. However, finding suitable available accommodation would be harder and could take just as long as eviction process.
The other thing I always wonder about cases like this is no one ever proves they are on the waiting list with the council it's based on trust.
Presumably his wife has the support to complete the forms etc and the hospital and care teams are working with the council to advocate the move.
This should certainly help.
When they state stay till eviction it's because a person ready has suitable accommodation
These people are no longer in suitable accommodation which the council have to consider - their circumstances have changed and they would need to move regardless of the sale.
The council actively delaying purely waiting on eviction will not go down with the courts as they will have left a person suffering with medical problems for no valid reason.
Of course not having a suitable property for them to move into is a valid reason.
Either way it's going to be a slow process0 -
Thanks for all the responses. I agree it was irresponsible of the EA to show people around with a sick and incapacitated person in situ.The man’s wife did not speak English at all and looked confused when I was being shown around. I’m not sure she fully understands what is going on and therefore I’m wondering who has even organised their application to the council, ie they might not even be on the waiting list.The house is otherwise ideal and in great condition, the couple have clearly taken good care of their friends house, but I don’t want to be involved in displacing a sick and elderly man so not going to put an offer in. Thanks5
-
I think you have made the right decision. It may be clearer further on if you haven't found anywhere later.climbthatwallseegar said:Thanks for all the responses. I agree it was irresponsible of the EA to show people around with a sick and incapacitated person in situ.The man’s wife did not speak English at all and looked confused when I was being shown around. I’m not sure she fully understands what is going on and therefore I’m wondering who has even organised their application to the council, ie they might not even be on the waiting list.The house is otherwise ideal and in great condition, the couple have clearly taken good care of their friends house, but I don’t want to be involved in displacing a sick and elderly man so not going to put an offer in. ThanksI recall that scene when my MIL was terminally ill and it's a very stressful sad situation they seem to have found themselves in.
he may be more ill than you're being led to believe.
well done you for your moral code x1 -
The man’s wife did not speak English at all
They may not have rights to a council property, It sounds as if they are going to abuse the emergency housing system to get what they want.
However it the vender signs and says it will be sold with vacant possession he will be liable for all fees and compo.0 -
I don't think they are planning to abuse the system. The man is barely conscious and the wife doesn't appear to understand English at all so not sure how they'd be able to play the system. Council houses aren't exactly easy to come by, emergency or not. My reading of the situation (pure guesswork) is that the owner, who is their friend, now wants them out but doesn't want to evict them so has advised them that if he sells they will somehow qualify for Council housing. I doubt they understand how it all works.
2 -
Do you really think that's what it is? What on earth makes you think that? To me it sounds like the poor guy in the bed is seriously ill.Pok3mon said:The man’s wife did not speak English at all
They may not have rights to a council property, It sounds as if they are going to abuse the emergency housing system to get what they want.
However it the vender signs and says it will be sold with vacant possession he will be liable for all fees and compo.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards