We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The BPA on the TV stage
beamerguy
Posts: 17,587 Forumite
This is hosted by the Telegraph and in this video they feature the CEO of the British Parking Association, called Andrew Pester.
Apart from the waffle, he mentions "EFFECTIVE PARKING" ... REMEMBER THAT
Moving on, when asked about private parking operators, Pester says "the key here is between the landowner and the parking operator" AND ... according to Pester, the BPA are working very hard with the landowner to see what they want to achieve ?
Moving on, Pester said "we have been raising standards for the last 50 years" ????
Pester goes on to say that Sir Greg Knight has introduced the new code of practice and that Murdock in Scotland has looked at this ?
Note what Pester says about Hospital parking ?
Moving on, Pester says that the BPA are the leading authority in the parking sector ??
STOP YOU THERE FOLKS ..... why does the BPA have so many scammers as members ?
Moving on ... Pester says they are driving standards forwards ? HE MEANS THE BPA SCAMMERS ?
What a car crash interview for Pester, really does remind me of the car crash interview of Patrick Troy on BBC Watchdog ......
The question to the BPA is why do you allow scammers to be members. The BPA have never answered that ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=815tFw2WJFc&ab_channel=BritishParkingAssociation
Apart from the waffle, he mentions "EFFECTIVE PARKING" ... REMEMBER THAT
Moving on, when asked about private parking operators, Pester says "the key here is between the landowner and the parking operator" AND ... according to Pester, the BPA are working very hard with the landowner to see what they want to achieve ?
Moving on, Pester said "we have been raising standards for the last 50 years" ????
Pester goes on to say that Sir Greg Knight has introduced the new code of practice and that Murdock in Scotland has looked at this ?
Note what Pester says about Hospital parking ?
Moving on, Pester says that the BPA are the leading authority in the parking sector ??
STOP YOU THERE FOLKS ..... why does the BPA have so many scammers as members ?
Moving on ... Pester says they are driving standards forwards ? HE MEANS THE BPA SCAMMERS ?
What a car crash interview for Pester, really does remind me of the car crash interview of Patrick Troy on BBC Watchdog ......
The question to the BPA is why do you allow scammers to be members. The BPA have never answered that ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=815tFw2WJFc&ab_channel=BritishParkingAssociation4
Comments
-
There is never any point to these TV programmes unless there is someone who understands the parking industry, and can ask the questions TV presenters never think to ask.
Question number one, how is the former head of the BPA doing, having been convicted of sex offences and is now on the sex offenders register because he committed sex offences whilst head of the BPA?
Question number two, how is committing sex offences whilst being the head of the BPA driving standards up, or even forwards?
Question number three, why have MPs across all parties referred to the unregulated private parking companies that you represent as rogues, scammers, and bloodsuckers?I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks5 -
YUP, the BPA would not have known they had a sexual predator as their CEO. BUT, they must now know that their current CEO is a failure
Guess they have to take what they can get, very few people would take on a job where wages are paid from subscribing known scammers. This is called the BPA ?1 -
One of the things i would like to see would be for those who have access to sensitive data, such as the registered keeper data from the DVLA to have full enhanced CRB/DBS checks.As it is the system is wide open to abuse, and it wouldn't surprise me if some characters involved in PPC land have some history.From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"4 -
But this is the same as the police, social services, hospitals, etc., etc., etc. That is why corruption is ever present. The only vetting worth its salt is positive vetting, but it s time consuming and expensive.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
What an insipid interview. The interviewer never once challenged any of the statements made by Pester.If I have trouble getting to sleep tonight, I'll watch that again, guaranteed zzzzs in minutes!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street2 -
Not challenging statements made by the BPA reminds me of the lead up to the POFA 2012, Schedule 4, when the BPA were taken to be some sort of regulator or expert and their wrong figures and reasoning was allowed to steer the DFT’s impact assessment for replacing clamping with ‘keeper liability’.
And then, despite promises to review the impact after 2 years, the impact of handing a known rogue clamping industry that diabolical power was never reviewed.And no-one at the time thought to consider why PPCs put ticket ‘value’ up to 3 figures despite the fact that’s double the sum of a Local Authority parking penalty charge. As the BPA raced to cement £100 into their CoP as if that was fair and reasonable.All of it was swallowed without question and we are where we are today, as a result of that farce and the damage of the Supreme Court, who also took the BPA CoP to be something it isn’t.
Something is wrong when intelligent people don’t question what a non independent rep for a known rogue industry says.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456K Spending & Discounts
- 248.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.9K Life & Family
- 263.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


