We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unadopted Road

shelley_hl
Posts: 3 Newbie

Hi there, we have bought a smallholding and the access to the house is off an unadopted / private road. We have established access to the farm through prescriptive rights, it had been used for 20+ plus by the farmer we bought from. We plan to convert one of our barns using Class Q development rights into an additional dwelling. Neighbours have previously stated that no-one could build within our small holding due to the unadopted road. Is this correct? Can the neighbours object to this build and effectively block access by not permitting it, as the road is private? Many thanks.
0
Comments
-
I think there's a principle that you can't necessarily increase the burden of an easement e.g. if a farm has prescriptive rights, they can't then build a whole housing estate with dozens of houses using their rights along the road. But I'm not sure if that kicks in with just one more dwelling being built. I would suggest you seek legal advice on it, especially if neighbours are likely to kick up a fuss.1
-
I would have thought it would be due to the fact the road is private not that it’s un adopted.0
-
Thanks both- I'm unsure on what control the residents of an unadopted have. I have read round quite a bit, and can see a lot of info about the responsibilities residents have regarding upkeep of the road, but cannot find much about access and easements, and whether they would have the right to block an additional dwelling being built (with permitted development rights).0
-
You have rights to use the road for access.
Who owns the road?0 -
It is a private road, which means it has not been adopted by the local authority and are not maintainable by them, but by the respective frontagers.
0 -
We've just moved into a house on a private road. There is a small field opposite us which is owned by the local council and rented out to someone who keeps horses on it.
I don't know all the details about this, as we weren't living there at the time, but apparently the council wanted to build on the field a few years ago - and the residents successfully blocked it on the grounds that they wouldn't grant access.
It probably helped that one of the residents is a solicitor!0 -
shelley_hl said:We plan to convert one of our barns using Class Q development rights into an additional dwelling. Neighbours have previously stated that no-one could build within our small holding due to the unadopted road. Is this correct? Can the neighbours object to this build and effectively block access by not permitting it, as the road is private?
Have you obtained professional advice regarding the feasibility of Class Q being allowed? If not, that would be the best way of answering your question, or if you have had advice already then go back to them for clarification about the access.
E.g. - is the land the barn is sited on actually agricultural use at the present time? A 'smallholding' is not necessarily 'agricultural' for the purposes of planning.
Notwithstanding the issue of legal rights to use the road, the council might take the view that additional development served only by a private road is not acceptable - for example if it cannot be reasonably served by refuse/recycling vehicles - and thus condition Q2(1)(e) might be invoked.
Before upsetting the neighbours too much with discussion about legal rights, I personally would want to confirm (to a reasonable level of probability) that the development would actually be allowed in planning terms.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards