PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Does this logic make sense for a first time buyer?

Does my thinking sound reasonable or is it flawed anywhere?  

I had thought about going for help to buy or shared ownership in London to buy a first property. However, I’m pretty sure that within the next 2 years, I’ll get a pay rise and be able to build up a bigger deposit which would put resales more easily within reach, assuming property prices don’t increase dramatically in the next 2 years. I thought this would be a better option than to a buy a very inflated help to buy new build or pay increasing rent on a shared ownership property. Looking at help to buy and shared ownership, I think it would make it very difficult for me to pay off the equity loan or buy 100% of the property any time soon due to how much more expensive these properties are compared to resales. 

My thought is that with a normal mortgage and staying within what’s affordable, I can have a more comfortable life without having to worry about how to own the property outright (I.e. how to pay off the large equity loan or how to staircase to 100%) 

Comments

  • Salemicus
    Salemicus Posts: 343 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    This sounds reasonable, yes, but it also has flaws.

    The first flaw, as you rightly note, is that if property prices increase significantly, you could be even further away from your goal. The second flaw is that you will still need to live somewhere in the intervening period, and if your rental costs are high, then again it won't bring you closer to your goal.

    Ultimately, every plan is flawed, because it's a dynamic market and there's no foolproof path to take. But I followed something very like your plan myself.
  • Ybe
    Ybe Posts: 445 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Salemicus said:
    This sounds reasonable, yes, but it also has flaws.

    The first flaw, as you rightly note, is that if property prices increase significantly, you could be even further away from your goal. The second flaw is that you will still need to live somewhere in the intervening period, and if your rental costs are high, then again it won't bring you closer to your goal.

    Ultimately, every plan is flawed, because it's a dynamic market and there's no foolproof path to take. But I followed something very like your plan myself.
    Can I ask how did it work out for you? Do you think you made the right decision be using a buying scheme? 
  • Ybe
    Ybe Posts: 445 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Instead of using a buying scheme*
  • Salemicus
    Salemicus Posts: 343 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes, it worked out well for me, and I definitely think I made the right decision. Buying in London is expensive enough as it is without paying extra for an overpriced new build, and I regard shared ownership as a trap.

    But just because it worked for me, doesn't mean it will work for you. The next few years may well be very different, no-one has a crystal ball.
  • Ybe
    Ybe Posts: 445 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Salemicus said:
    Yes, it worked out well for me, and I definitely think I made the right decision. Buying in London is expensive enough as it is without paying extra for an overpriced new build, and I regard shared ownership as a trap.

    But just because it worked for me, doesn't mean it will work for you. The next few years may well be very different, no-one has a crystal ball.
    Help to buy seems like a trap too to me. Interest free for 5 years but then quickly increasing interest rates and a huge lump sum to pay or remortgage. 
  • Ybe
    Ybe Posts: 445 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    The issue is that because of how expensive the London market is, with help to buy, I’d have to take a six figure equity loan. Which is a huge figure to repay on top of the mortgage. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.